Replies

Out of curiosity, I went and read not the RedState website, but the actual posts made on Twitter by Erick Erickson who wrote this article.

This is a professional of any kind? Who the hell talks like this and can be expected to be taken seriously?

http://twitter.com/ewerickson

He tweets, "In Washington, when people call you a "fiscal conservative" they simply mean you are for abortion and gay marriage."

Huh??? What does either have to do with fiscal conservatism?

Then there's, "I am so totally gonna have to take a real suitcase and check a bag for CPAC. A full week away from home."

Please stay home, Mr. Valley Man

And the clueless among the equally clueless, "It's not that birfers are racist. It's that they just don't think Hawaiians should be eligible for the Presidency."

And now we know why this guy couldn't argue Wong Kim Ark on the best day of his life. Just one, ONE quote from Henry C. Ide in the 1800's was more informative to explaining that case than anything that comes close to the so-called intellectuals of today.

It's a sad, ignorant and shameful comparison, not to mention a true reflection on today's poor education system.

In my opinion, the RINOs in Congress were also guilty of pushing legislation to change Article II. We saw it again in 2008 with S. 2678 and S.R. 511 when this came out:

http://zapem.wordpress.com/2009/01/11/obama-knew-he-wasnt-eligible-for-potus/

And it's because of that guilt they stay mum about Obama's legitimacy and continue to say nothing. But all the proof shows that Congress started this problem. The people pick up on it and question what's going on and immediately they are attacked with hardly any true Republican or even a constitution-loving Democrat to defend them. And why? Because they'd have to admit their own guilt and hand in this thing and they won't.

That's what is really going on here and the reason why MOST of them need to be voted out in November and in 2012. Because they're mostly all corrupt.

These jokers like Erickson are having a field day at the people's expense for a problem that originated in Congress and now they have the audacity to tell these people that if they dare question anything, they aren't welcome in their little cliques.