Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: aruanan
There are other good reports on the chronology of McIntyre's efforts to obtain the data over several years. Check out this web site: http://bishophill.squarespace.com/blog/2009/9/29/the-yamal-implosion.html

It is amazing to what length's Briffa went in order to conceal his data. Even when he was backed into a corner it still took over a year and extraordinary efforts by McIntyre to pull the data because Briffa had not meta tagged it (similar to a document dump in response to a subpoena).

This could be a major development if it can just get some MSM legs. Fox News, where are you!

8 posted on 10/01/2009 9:03:13 AM PDT by Thickman (Term limits are the answer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Thickman

IIRC the only reason Briffa had to disclose the data was that he had submitted to the Royal Society, who I understand strictly require submitters to enter their data to an archive that RS control.

Now the Royal Society have been hopelessly pro-AGW to date, but in this case their rules have allowed the truth to come out.


10 posted on 10/01/2009 9:08:16 AM PDT by agere_contra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson