[plenipotentiary]

The Courts are trying to pretend it’s a Political Question, so they can use lack of standing to get rid, but this is really a Constitutional question, so no standing is required. The Courts have a duty to uphold the Constitution.

[Sibre Fan]

The Courts are trying to pretend it’s a Political Question, so they can use lack of standing to get rid, but this is really a Constitutional question, so no standing is required. The Courts have a duty to uphold the Constitution.

Well, not quite.

First, under established law, standing is required to raise a Constitutional question.

Second, "standing" is irrelevant to the Political Question Doctrine. In other words, even if a person does have "standing," the court cannot hear the case if it raises a "political question."

So, the standing/constitutional issue, and the political question issue are two different concepts.