He’s not a doctor. He’s a fraud.
Where can we email Dr. Phil??
His comments were uncalled for...
The vet lawyer made a mistake which cost him his crdibility: He asked Shoshana if she had been to Iraq (Shoshana was a POW there).
He is right, but this cost him his argument.
I keep waiting for some shrink to attribute this to PRE-traumatic stress syndrome.
How did that fat pos ever get in the military.
It does no one any good to phsycho babble these guys. They are part of a global cabal and cult that wants to kill and thinks going to their whorehouse, where they can rape 72 virgins for eternity, is an honor.
The rest of their peace loving family must understand this; until they go through a spiritual and mental reformation they can never be viewed as a people who respect other religions and people without equivocation and their religious views are to be respected in the same way ours should be.
Moreover, their silence gives both sanction and imprimatur to this murderous behavior.
It is unbelievable that no one outside CAIR stands in solidarity with humanity to condemn this. CAIR for those who are uninformed because they just can't be bothered with facts is the modern day Muslim Brotherhood and PLA organization which seeks to act as a political arm of Islam and promote Islam by claiming they are the ones being martyred. Still yesterday, CAIR once again begins their fake condemnation of their brother in arms and then says their will surely be backlash against muslims. Really? Show me, Ibrahim Hooper, how many muslims died in the aftermath of 911? How many muslims were marginalized in the last eight years? The answer? NONE! You are a fatuous liar. Islam is currently responsible for all major conflicts in the world. We see what is happening in Darfur. Islamic Arabs are emigrating south through Africa and in their wake leaving dead bodies of those they consider not worthy to be human anymore by their faith in Christ. How can we accept you when you kill thousands of people around the world in the name of your allah?
Your message of peace must not be real nor very effective if you have to make you point with the blade of a knife or the point of a gun. In fact, your belief system demands conversion, now, here on earth or death to the non-believer.
Really? I mean Really?! That is your message? take precious time out my day and Pray to allah five times each day on a rug, facing east, with my ass in the air?
Why? So I can demonstrate fealty and vulnerability?
Contrast your message with the message from my God.
For all have sinned and fallen short of the Glory of God.
For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.
But God demonstrates His own love toward us, in that while we were still sinners, Christ died for us.
For everyone who calls on the name of the Lord will be saved
Therefore, there is now no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus
God is a gentleman and father and says:
Here I am! I stand at the door and knock. If anyone hears my voice and opens the door, I will come in and eat with him, and he with me.
For I am convinced that neither death nor life, neither angels nor demons, neither the present nor the future, nor any powers, neither height nor depth, nor anything else in all creation, will be able to separate us from the love of God that is in Christ Jesus our Lord.
There is no exhortation to love God or perish through violence visited by a very fallible human being.
Only God can judge, for only he is perfect and knows what is or isn't worthy or innocent.
Do you see the difference between our beliefs?
Your allah demands abeyance.
My God reaches his arms out to you, as a loving father, to hold you close, protect you and guide you.
God loves you.
(I say "goofy acting" because, in view of the occasion, the lawyer shouldn't have been grinning so broadly into the camera as he was introduced;further, his tone throughout the clip is too relaxed and conciliatory.)
What struck me most was Johnson's repeated claim that speculation about the mass murders at Ft. Hood having a religiously-motivated background were "dangerous" ("Dr." Phil chimed in, saying that the reference to another, similar attack perpetrated by a soldier with an Islamic surname was "irresponsible").
Johnson is thus saying that it is not "dangerous" to speculate about Post-Traumatic Syndrome contributing to the mass murder, but that it is "dangerous" (read: morally offensive, unethical) to even only SPECULATE that religious hate was part of the motivation.
I guess that Ms. Johnson doesn't hold freedom of thought and freedom of speech in very high regard.
(It also bothered me that Ms. Johnson said "I AM a P.O.W." rather than, e.g., "I am a former P.O.W.")
Ms. Johnson, a former food specialist, should be thankful for even being allowed to converse / debate with college-educated experts.
Regards,