Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: penelopesire; seekthetruth; television is just wrong; jcsjcm; BP2; Pablo Mac; April Lexington; ...

Links

*****

The DC District Court Is Not the Only Court In Which to File a Quo Warranto Action

http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/10/dc-district-court-in-not-only-court-in.html

.
.

Judge Carter: “The writ of quo warranto must be brought within the District of Columbia because President Obama holds office within that district.”

http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/2009/10/29/judge-carter-the-writ-of-quo-warranto-must-be-brought-within-the-district-of-columbia-because-president-obama-holds-office-within-that-district/


2 posted on 11/09/2009 4:08:14 PM PST by STARWISE (The Art & Science Institute of Chicago Politics NE Div: now open at the White House)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: STARWISE
Judge Carter: “The writ of quo warranto must be brought within the District of Columbia because President Obama holds office within that district.”

With all due respect to the Judge, isn't the Presidency different than every other office, because it has duties affecting ALL states? A governor, a Senator, or a Congressman have offices in the District of Columbia, and do their work in DC, but are appointed by the voters of their states (or in the case of Representatives, their districts). The President and Vice-President are elected by the voters of all states. Even though they "hold office" within the District of Columbia, they represent the entire populace. I don't get the restriction.

3 posted on 11/09/2009 4:18:38 PM PST by Pearls Before Swine (Is /sarc really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson