Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: thefactor

sorry, in my quote from the paper, “weighted = weighed.”


2 posted on 11/13/2009 9:07:25 AM PST by thefactor (yes, as a matter of fact, i DID only read the excerpt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: thefactor

1. Here:

Sanders challenged his conviction, arguing that a law criminalizing the killing of a fetus “at every state of gestation” is unconstitutional because it violates the establishment clause of the First Amendment as incorporated against the states by the Fourteenth Amendment. However, the Texas appellate court upheld the statute because its “principal or primary effect” is not to advance religion, finding that it has a valid secular purpose in that it “serves the State’s legitimate secular interest in protecting unborn children from the criminal acts of others.”
http://public.getlegal.com/articles/fetal-homicide-laws

2. YO TEXANS?!!! Does Texas does Texas have terrorism statute???


3 posted on 11/13/2009 9:18:00 AM PST by Bulwinkle (Alec, a.k.a. Daffy Duck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson