Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: John.Galt2012

Almost sounds a little Marxist/Socialist doesn’t it. Free the slaves of the people I don’t like, but keep my slaves and of course the people who I DO like can keep their slaves. No wonder he likes Lincoln so much.


16 posted on 12/03/2009 8:04:02 AM PST by John.Galt2012 (I'll take Liberty and you can keep the "Change"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: John.Galt2012

“Almost sounds a little Marxist/Socialist doesn’t it.”

No, it doesn’t. Marxists are ideologues. Lincoln was operating acording to practical considerations. I get sick of the idolatry, but there were real problems involved.

For one, he had no authority to free slaves within the Union, per Dred Scott.

Second, one wouldn’t want to risk alienating the border states in the middle of a war that’s not going all that well to begin with.

Third, even if it wasn’t like a thunderbolt from God that broke the chains, at least it finally made the war about slavery (to some degree), which was better than the previous cause. “Union!” Pretty empty-sounding after all these years, right? Maybe that’s why people barely talk about it anymore.


20 posted on 12/03/2009 8:10:48 AM PST by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson