[Marine_Uncle]

I think at this point it would be helpful if someone with a very clear concise understanding of how the Senate ratification process can effect anything in a way of a treaty zero might sign off on come forth and educate us.
My understanding is that the Senate must in a majority ratify any treaty signed by the POTUS. If a treaty is not approved, then it is not worth the paper that contains the wording.
If what I say is accurate. Then whatever the goon signs or agrees upon is null and void and will have no effect upon this country. Otherwise we may finally be up shit creek with out the paddle as we float slowly toward the huge waterfall with the large set of rocks at it's base.

[Bhoy]

I think that if the treaty is not passed by the Senate it is null and void. The problem is the EPA is [did this week?] classifying carbon dioxide as a pollutant WITHOUT Congressional approval, instruction, whatever & since all the big companies & the judiciary are in the tank for the NWO, I don’t know what can be done.

[ntnychik]

In ‘97, the dem-controlled Senate voted against the Kyoto treaty 95-0. One can hope. Or maybe things have changed.