Great link. Thank you. There should be 10,000 scientists doing this straight forward analysis in every corner of the globe - that’s how you get to “consensus”. You publish all of the findings and if you make adjustments, you have to “prove” the adjustment is correct, otherwise the raw numbers are used. This may not be the smoking gun, but it’s definitely enough evidence to require a completely public review of the entire dataset.
The only reason the data and the adjustments are kept secret is to hide something. Without transparency, it’s opinion, not science.
BTW, if the planet truly is warming and we are causing something that could eventually destroy my children’s children’s future, I want to know about it. I want to know and I would stand up for measures to fix it - but you’ve been caught fudging the facts, so now we want to see it all or you get no mo’ money!
Software engineers, not scientists.
As the reconstruction shows, the real facts about the fraud are in the software ....