Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: counterpunch

I wasn’t the only one to notice Tancredo listed under totalitarian and Edwards under libertarian. That chart was and is a piece of crap. Only an ignorant little ankle biter like you would be stupid enough to defend it.


42 posted on 12/10/2009 3:06:34 PM PST by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]


To: pissant

The Political Compass is more more of a concept than anything else.
It is simply illustrating that politics is multi-dimesional, not just linear left/right.

If there was a chart that put Hunter on the Autoritarian side and Edwards on Libertarian side, that is because Edwards is far more socially permissive than Hunter.
You disagree with that?

But also keep in mind, where anyone falls on the graph is up to how the person charting them interprets the issues and the candidates’ positions. It is not impervious to bad data or personal bias.

I never endorsed any particular chart created by someone using the Political Compass.
I only only discussed it as a concept.
It is and remains valid. Otherwise, without an X,Y axis, Ron Paul and Dennis Kucinich, for example, may appear to be ideological soulmates in a simplified linear graph.


43 posted on 12/10/2009 3:18:11 PM PST by counterpunch (In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem. Government is the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson