Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: jackv
Per your quote, the Constitution says nothing about dual citizenship. You then append your own interpretation of its words and treat them as if they are indisputable fact. That is not so. Your own personal beliefs will not become an indisputable fact no matter how many times you repeat them. And I'm sorry to tell you that no court is going to validate that belief either.

We do get it. You have an emotional block on this issue that precludes rationally processing the available data.

201 posted on 01/06/2010 12:01:20 PM PST by tired_old_conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies ]


To: tired_old_conservative
You must have missed this part...

"British Nationality Act of 1948 (Part II, Section 5): Subject to the provisions of this section, a person born after the commencement of this Act shall be a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies by descent if his father is a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies at the time of the birth."

In other words, at the time of his birth, Barack Obama Jr. was both a U.S. citizen (by virtue of being born in Hawaii) and a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies (or the UKC) by virtue of being born to a father who was a citizen of the UKC.

Schwartzenegger and Kissinger could never qualify either.

206 posted on 01/06/2010 12:07:48 PM PST by jackv (The darkness hates the light!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson