Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: jamese777

No, you’re definitely an Obot. “62 adjudications with no victories for any plaintiff”. None that consider the matter of Natural Born Citizenship on its merits. That alone tellls us that they don’t want a prper hearing cos they no Obanmbi isn’t NBC. He has admitted his dad was Kenyan for goodness sake. No President since the Founders has openly had a non US citizen parent.


35 posted on 01/26/2010 6:27:01 PM PST by plenipotentiary (Obama was a BRITISH SUBJECT at birth, passed to him via Pops, can't be NBC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: plenipotentiary

No, you’re definitely an Obot. “62 adjudications with no victories for any plaintiff”. None that consider the matter of Natural Born Citizenship on its merits. That alone tellls us that they don’t want a prper hearing cos they no Obanmbi isn’t NBC. He has admitted his dad was Kenyan for goodness sake. No President since the Founders has openly had a non US citizen parent.


You’re obviously a mental child who resorts to sixth grade playground name calling when you can’t hold up your end of a debate on an intellectual level.

Obviously you don’t have a clue what “adjudication” means.
Here’s a precise legal definition of the term for you: “The legal process of resolving a dispute. The formal giving or pronouncing of a judgment or decree in a court proceeding; also the judgment or decision given. The entry of a decree by a court in respect to the parties in a case. It implies a hearing by a court, after notice, of legal evidence on the factual issue(s) involved. The equivalent of a determination. It indicates that the claims of all the parties thereto have been considered and set at rest.”

When a lawsuit is dismissed or denied a trial hearing for lack of standing, that is an adjudication. And if a judge or justice rules that a lawsuit has no merit, it has been adjudicated as having been dismissed or denied a trial.

If someone were to sue you and the court threw the case out, did you win?

With specific regard to Obama’s eligibility that has now happened 62 times including 7 times at the US Supreme Court which operates under “the rule of four” meaning that it only takes four justices to agree to hear a suit before the full court. Which further means that no Obama eligibility lawsuit has impressed any combination of originalist, strict constructionist Justices Alito, Kennedy, Roberts, Scalia and Thomas enough to grant it a hearing.

The criminal courts are the way to resolve the Obama eligibility issue, not the civil courts. The only legitimate constitutional issue is whether Obama’s COLB is forged, tampered with or fraudulent. Forgery and fraud are criminal matters not civil matters.

I’m done with you now. Recess is over. Go back to class.


36 posted on 01/27/2010 12:15:19 PM PST by jamese777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson