Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: jamese777
If forensic experts determine that there is tampering or forgery, then criminal charges can be filed and impeachment proceedings would ensue.

One cannot fault your logic. But as a matter of fact, Congress would be under no obligation to proceed with Impeachment, and it is even less likely that the Senate would convict.

It simply does not follow that any finding of the courts, or any criminal indictment ... or even conviction ...would AUTOMATICALLY lead to Impeachment.

Good first step in a very, very long and arduous race.

53 posted on 01/29/2010 7:15:07 AM PST by Kenny Bunk (Go-Go Donofrio. get us that Writ of Quo Warranto!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: Kenny Bunk

It was not my intention to imply that impeachment or removal by Senate trial would be “obligated” or “automatic.” However if a president were to be convicted of a felony, it is highly likely that president would be viewed as a liability and a pariah to his own party.

Look at how quickly a Democratic majority got rid of Rod Blagojevich in Illinois last year and it is the Republican majority in South Carolina that is trying to get rid of Mark Sanford. And six out of seventeen Republicans voted to impeach Richard Nixon when the House Judiciary Committee drew up articles of impeachment. Losing those Republican votes is what convinced Nixon to resign because the full House voting the Articles out and a likely conviction by the Senate became a foregone conclusion.


56 posted on 01/29/2010 9:59:27 AM PST by jamese777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson