[ilgipper]

Do you disagree with the concepts he is discussing with the progressive movement? I think is about 95% dead on. There’s a few things I view differently about what he’s said, mostly the lumping of everyone from Bush to Teddy Roosevelt into the same category of ‘progressive’, but overall he has a strong point.

In addition, I believe the work he is doing is a large contributor to the rapid demise of the Democrat party. There is a reason the WH press team quickly added Beck to their talking points last summer...lumped in with Cheney, Rush and others. He is effective and he has changed the political environment — for the better.

[jenk]

He must realize that when he says things like both parties are no good and his thoughts on libertarianism and inclusion of Ron Paul as a serious person to follow, not to mention the third party crap, he is talking (mostly) to people who are new to the movement and are only listening to him. If he wants to continue to deny that his 4 hours of media per day have nothing to do with politics and the political landscape, and yes, leadership, he must wake up.

The Progressive stuff is good to know, but that is not what I am at odds with, mostly.