Replies

Let's attack these:

A world without the Progressive Era would be a world with:

Only men voting: The 19th Amendment giving women the right to vote was the product of progressivisim. Beck thinks women are second-class citizens.No, Conservatism is all about individual rights. The 19th Amendment is not a "Progressive" (ie Liberal) item. Just like Conservatives (Republicans) fought against slavery and racial discrimination, this is another right we would have fought for. In addition, as this was done as a Constitutional amendment, it followed the Conservative path of respecting the Constitutional process.
No cell phone or low-cost long-distance telephone service: It was the breakup of AT&T in the 1970s under the progressive antitrust laws that allowed for today's telecommunications (and computer) systems. Beck thinks corporations should have no restraints at all. Again, they don't understand Conservatives at all. Anti-trust laws ensure a free market, something that Conservatives fight for. Liberals are the ones who seek to over-regulate the market to the point there is a monopoly based on Government interventionism in the markets. A freer market may have resulted in more competition without the need for this particular anti-trust action, but is in no way implying that this was a "progressive" action. Progressives would have the fedgov take over said industry.
State legislatures electing U.S. senators: The 17th Amendment, part of the progressive movement, allowed for the direct election of senators. Again, this followed the Constitutional process thus, is Conservative by the very act of creation. This isn't a "progressive" law in the least.
The author seems to be under the false belief that just because something is new or changes the status quo, it must be "progressive".