Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: BuckeyeTexan

Part two:

Now here’s the mechanism for the author’s evil little intent:

“From an evidence standpoint, five of the six above vital records procedures support the argument that Hawaii’s birth certificate printout, called a Certification of Live Birth, is a summary derived from 1961 business records that lack an adequate indicia of reliability that would afford the trier of fact a satisfactory basis for evaluating the truth of document’s statements.”

Let me put this into another example form BuckeyeTexan, that you have experience with. Assume:

Texas State law provides 3 ways of obtaining a title to a vehicle:

1) The applicant presents a notarized bill of sale to himself at the DMV.

2) The applicant applies for a title based on the abandonment of the vehicle on his property for a period of 120 days.

3) The applicant gives a bond that neither of the two above ways are applicable.

Now, common sense tells you 2 of these 3 ways are more prone to fraud. You could lie on No.2, and give phony addresses of owners, etc. You get a $1,000 car for free. On No. 3, the amount of the bond is probably 150% the value of the car, say $1500 on a $1000 car, and would cost $150 to obtain. If a crook, applicant gets the $1,000 car for $150.

Both number 2 and 3 have an economic incentive to lie.

Now this calculating author wold approach it like this:

Since 2 of the 3 ways that one could get a Texas vehicle license are fraught with the potential of fraud, and lack indicia of reliability, such that a judge can not determine the truth of a Texas vehicle title. Therefore, no Texas vehicle title can be presumed valid.

See the illogic: First, the potential for fraud is characterized as actualized fraud. Which is jumping to a legal conclusion without any evidence. And by using “2/3” of the PROCEDURES as bad, he makes 100% of the Texas titles look bad.

Problem is, 99% of the titles are obtained by method no. 1 which are not fraught with potential of fraud. So, where the truth is maybe 1% of 1% are fraud, he has managed to make all 100% look bad.

parsy, who says “Nice trick, Foretti, but you can’t slip that past me!”


25 posted on 02/24/2010 6:42:42 PM PST by parsifal (Abatis: Rubbish in front of a fort, to prevent the rubbish outside from molesting the rubbish inside)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: parsifal

And of course, none of the perps are new born babies attempting to put one over on the State of Texas.


65 posted on 02/24/2010 9:15:54 PM PST by lucysmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson