Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama’s Straw Man Defense - Kerchner v. Obama, Article II, eligibility
drkatesview ^ | March 16, 2010 | Dr. Kate

Posted on 03/16/2010 5:43:10 AM PDT by opentalk

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
Full article at link


1 posted on 03/16/2010 5:43:10 AM PDT by opentalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: opentalk

An illegal usurper uses unlawful means
with others, meeting in illegal ways,
to overthrow the US Constitution
with a wink and nod from SCOTUS and DOJ.

Hmmmmmm. Hmmmmmm. Hmmmmmm.


2 posted on 03/16/2010 5:46:48 AM PDT by Diogenesis ("Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God." --Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LucyT

Ping.


3 posted on 03/16/2010 5:56:15 AM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: opentalk

This will ultimately destroy the Democratic party... they were derelict in their duty to properly verify the eligibility of a presidential candidate.

Lots of people need to go to jail over this one.


4 posted on 03/16/2010 6:05:09 AM PDT by flash2368
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis
...to overthrow the US Constitution

It continues -- ignore constitution to pass unconstitutional health care, DOJ withholding information during confirmation, stopping investigation of Acorn,--House of cards.

5 posted on 03/16/2010 6:19:50 AM PDT by opentalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: opentalk
Commander Kerchner's Statement on the Opposition Brief :

--What a lame and empty defense. Basically they're saying Obama and Congress can totally ignore the U.S. Constitution and there is nothing We the People can legally do about it. No one has standing to right the wrong when Obama & Congress illegally violate Article II of the Constitution and seat illegally an ineligible person as President and Commander in Chief of our vast military power.

-- We the People created the federal government and We the People are going to fix this totally broken and runaway federal government. These Progressive/Socialist/Marxists have gone a bridge too far in the disgraceful and unconstitutional 2008 election. This will not stand. We the People will not permit it.

Charles Kerchner
Commander USNR (Retired)
Lead Plaintiff
Kerchner v Obama & Congress

6 posted on 03/16/2010 7:06:44 AM PDT by opentalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: opentalk
there is nothing We the People can legally do about it.

A Dem stating there's "no controlling legal authority" is no surprise.

7 posted on 03/16/2010 7:51:53 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW (Make yourselves sheep and the wolves will eat you. Ben Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel; OldDeckHand; Fred Nerks; null and void; stockpirate; george76; PhilDragoo; Candor7; ...
Image and video hosting by TinyPic

0bama’s Straw Man Defense - Kerchner v. Obama, Article II, eligibility

The appalling game-playing by 0bama’s lawyers in the Kerchner vs. 0bama and Congress appeal, including the Justice Department, is the kind of behavior that should draw disbarment and criminal penalties.

It already makes a mockery of justice and of the Constitution we know that. But the case that 0bama is ‘fighting’ is not the legal case that’s been brought against him.

Too cool to prove himself, 0bama has created and is shadowboxing ..."

. . . . Interesting article.

[Thanks, Red Steel.]

8 posted on 03/16/2010 9:40:09 AM PDT by LucyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: LucyT

*Bump*


9 posted on 03/16/2010 9:51:31 AM PDT by Diver Dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: opentalk

Interesting on the date and time of filing. He was just an ordinary non-office holding “citizen” (of some country) for two months between the time he resigned as Senator on Nov. 16, ‘08 to Jan. 20, ‘09.


10 posted on 03/16/2010 10:41:02 AM PDT by bgill (The framers of the US Constitution established an entire federal government in 18 pages.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: opentalk
his adoption by an Indonesian national would have required his naturalization upon return to the United States.

So then if there are no records of this naturalization, is he even an American citizen???

11 posted on 03/16/2010 10:49:35 AM PDT by Uncle Chip (TRUTH : Ignore it. Deride it. Allegorize it. Interpret it. But you can't ESCAPE it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bgill
--filed at 2:50 am on January 20, 2009, after Congress had confirmed the electoral college vote of Obama but just before he became bound to the Constitution through his oath.--

Must be very significant legally to case. - includes congress, small window before he is president, it was also before his executive order.

12 posted on 03/16/2010 10:54:59 AM PDT by opentalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: opentalk

This case appears to have been well thought out.


13 posted on 03/16/2010 10:57:27 AM PDT by Uncle Chip (TRUTH : Ignore it. Deride it. Allegorize it. Interpret it. But you can't ESCAPE it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Chip
Probably why the Obama machine will not answer the substance of the case. Still doing the standing dance.
14 posted on 03/16/2010 11:21:34 AM PDT by opentalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: opentalk
Amazing! There are only 14 posts to this thread.

The trolls who would normally have driven this thread up to a hundred or more by now must be busy on the very urgent health care issue on the various blogs and message boards.

That the trolls are missing in action today is an indication to me that they are, indeed, professional PR people and attorneys who are employed by the Obama machine.

15 posted on 03/16/2010 11:48:57 AM PDT by wintertime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: opentalk
I have never seen anything in Kerchner’s case that pleads that Obama is not eligible because he was not born in the geographical territory of the several states.

The argument about his father being a British citizen; the arguments about his dual citizenship or all the other defects in his loyalty position; are all very interesting but are losers at the Supreme Court level.

Under circumstances where you now have real record proof that he was born in Mombasa, it is suspicious that Kirchner pleads a case which is generally understood by the lawyers as a loser and ignores the case which everyone understands is Obama's real vulnerability.

16 posted on 03/16/2010 12:05:13 PM PDT by David (...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: David
I have never seen anything in Kerchner’s case that pleads that Obama is not eligible because he was not born in the geographical territory of the several states.

The lawsuit seems very thorough, (-I'm not a lawyer)

Law suit overview Table of Contents - 12 counts.

Not Born in USA Page 10

complete lawsuit

Talks about COLB and Birth Certificate.

#34-- Obama has not met his burden or otherwise adequately shown he was born in the United States of America.

#48--There is no Hawaiian hospital that has verified and confirmed that baby Obama and/or his mother were present in any such hospital at the time of Obama's alleged birth in Honolulu.

17 posted on 03/16/2010 2:38:05 PM PDT by opentalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: opentalk; LucyT
To your #17:

Good. What I have seen about that case has not been as complete as that.

There is this strong direction that he ought to be out because his father was not born in the US or because of his flopping around on citizenship. I agree that ought to be so. But as a lawyer, I can tell you that if we ever do get to a judicial resolution, the only thing that counts is where he was born.

His legal help is very good. They know he would have a problem with a number of the states in a reelection campaign and they have a scheme for how to deal with that problem. Not clear in my mind what they do.

18 posted on 03/16/2010 5:59:41 PM PDT by David (...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: flash2368

Examples need to be made of anyone complicit in this. I don’t think it will be many to jail though if any.


19 posted on 03/16/2010 8:11:08 PM PDT by tutstar (Baptist Ping list - freepmail me to get on or off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: flash2368

The fall out will be so ugly. Entire history books will be written on this scam.


20 posted on 03/16/2010 9:19:18 PM PDT by MadAboutPalin (You betcha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson