Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Hawthorn

“The feds can’t call it a “tax” because the amount collected in any State would be determined by the number of residents in that jurisdiction who didn’t buy health insurance, not by that State’s total population.”

I’m no lawyer, but what about federal excise taxes on cigarettes and alcohol? Those surely are taxes, but their apportionment across states depends on the extent of smoking and drinking and hence would not end up being apportioned by population.


41 posted on 03/25/2010 3:46:18 AM PDT by DrC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]


To: DrC

>> what about federal excise taxes on cigarettes and alcohol? Those surely are taxes, but their apportionment across states depends on the extent of smoking and drinking and hence would not end up being apportioned by population <<

Those are excise taxes — that is, taxes on things rather than taxes on persons.

(A poll or capitation tax is a tax on persons.)


42 posted on 03/25/2010 8:19:50 AM PDT by Hawthorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson