Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Non-Sequitur

“de-facto officer doctrine”

Thank you. I never knew this, but it surely makes sense. Sadly, however, it also provides an incentive for illegal office-holders to cling to their offices as long as possible, knowing that every act they conduct in the interim will have the same force of law as if they’d secured that office legally.


52 posted on 03/25/2010 9:10:30 AM PDT by DrC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]


To: DrC; Non-Sequitur

I wasn’t aware of that either. Can the people who knew the president was ineligible and refused to enforce the Constitution be tried for treason?

If so, we should be able to clean out Congress pretty easily and have the votes to overturn everything Obama did anyway.


54 posted on 03/25/2010 9:18:36 AM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

To: DrC

This also explains why Obama is cramming everything so hard. He knows his time is limited.

This also gives a POWERFUL argument why anybody who has the means to expose Obama as a usurper should DO IT NOW AND NOT WAIT UNTIL IT WOULD BE BETTER FOR REPUBLICANS.

Delaying the resolution of this issue in order to benefit Republicans in future elections would be trading a pound of prevention for an ounce of cure. Too much potentially irreversible damage is being done in the meantime.


55 posted on 03/25/2010 9:22:46 AM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

To: All
Here's another problem between the FactCheck photos and the original 'scan' of the COLB. I copied a section from the scan and resized it so the security border lines up in the same scale as the security border in one of the FactCheck photos. (see below)



If you've ever scanned a document on a flatbed scanner, you'll notice the underside of the scanner lid is usually padded with a white surface. That surface shows up around the edges of any document or photo you scan. You can see it around the edges of the scanned COLB, so this tells you how big the document is. If your document is bigger than your scanner bed, then anything on the document shows up on the image, going all the way to the edge of the image. Sometimes the edges of a scanned image will be black or very dark, which means the scanner lid was slightly ajar and let in enough light to overexpose the edge of the image.

Now, let's look at the document photographed by FactCheck. Somehow, the margin (outside of the security borders) is wider than on the scan. You can see this for yourself by looking at the margins on the FactCheck photos and comparing to the original scan. Also, if the scan was cropped, you wouldn't have the white area surrounding it. This means the document itself is bigger than what was scanned, yet in about every other way it's identical to the scans.

There's no way a document can grow, and the state of Hawaii wouldn't be able to issue two copies of a COLB that are virtually identical (including placement of date stamps and seals). The best explanation is that the FactCheck COLB was printed on a larger piece of certificate paper, but was otherwise made to look identical to the document that was allegedly scanned and posted at Fight the Smears. The FactCheck document is obviously fraudulent and the original scan was probably created digitally and printed out with a fraudulent certificate AFTER the state of Hawaii declared they couldn't verify any information contained on Obama's birth records.


60 posted on 03/25/2010 9:36:16 AM PDT by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson