“she ACCEPTED his offer to run with him in 2008, she could have said no, she did not have a gun put to her head, she said it was an honor to run with him, so was she a RINO then, where was the outrage then when she ran with him, is there really any difference between then and now”
Thank you for putting an end to this silliness. There are no legitimate arguments against Palin for supporting McCain.
Maybe I’ll do a search to find exactly who has been consistent on this. It can be a good way to expose deep-cover trolls.
The troll police. Get a life. Some people are all for Palin, even though she hasn’t said she is running, some are not.
Just the way it is, or do they have to meet your criteria as to their level of worship?
That’s why I say they have “phony outrage” because if they didn’t have outrage then, then they should not have outrage now, because she was even more vocal about her support during the campaign, she said it was an honor and a privilege to run with him..so were the same people who are trashing her now trash her then..its BS outrage, its people who never ever liked her to begin with, so they come up with this “Oh I am so upset about her supporting him, I no longer support her” please, they never liked her to begin with. Same crap you see on her facebook page, you see Dems sign up, become her “friend” then say they are Republicans who are angry at her supporting McCain
Same thing with the whole “She’s for amnesty” BS, really, she said that, when, last night, because she did NOT..the word amnesty, card check, path to citizenship, those words NEVER came out of her mouth, all she said was that she agreed with McCain about securing the border, DUH, who doesn’t want the border secure..but some went nuts and added more words to her mouth which she never said, just to promote their own agenda