Well funny YOU should mention that. LOL.
When this "story" first broke my original thought was someone is trying to smear FReepers. So I went through the poster in question's history, but couldn't find anything to get too bent out of shape about. Except some of the split hairs on HC.
Then I thought about a post I had just made regarding whether or not interogators that interrogated US detainees suspected of terrorism would have to swear an oath to the Consitution.
It would be easy for someone to do a drive-by and start twisting our words. The more you deny, the more suspicion is raised. Pretty good scial engineering tool and an Alinsky tactic "identify the target etc." No one wants to come to a poster's defense for fear of being labeled as a troll too.
Just my two cents.