No court is going to overturn an election two years after the fact. HOWEVER, this is great news because Texas can, and should, force him to produce his official long form birth certificate or be denied a place on the ballot in 2012.
Get two more big states, like Florida and Ohio to do the same, and unless Obama produced his official long form birth certificate he would be shut out of a second term even if the Democrat Party kept him as their candidate elsewhere.
Neither FL nor OH is an applicable state for election fraud. (You have to do your homework; citizen complaints of election fraud are posted on the sidebar of my blog. These are nothing more than statements from ‘complaining witnesses’ alerting the AG, a crime has been committed in this state.
TX state laws allow a party Chair to declare a candidate eligible; and allow mandamus to be used to get party Chairs to do their jobs. Or subject party Chairs to Open Records law.
At least, TX is the only state I know of now that satisfies all of these requirements; and has an AG who was the Judge in the case that makes my point.
I forgot to add, stop interjecting straw dogs into the argument. I mention nowhere that any work in which I am involved has as its motive, a desire to overturn an election. We only elect Electors in November; the Electors elected BO in December. And nothing in the Constitution required them to vet their choice as to Constitutional eligibility.
Neither of these states - FL or OH - has the same ballot eligibility as TX. Even states with such laws - we have identified 6 (six) such states thus far (although there are more which citizens must identify before I can draft citizen complaints of election fraud to their A’sG), GA, HI, MD, SC, TX, and VA - do not have these same laws in TX statutes, concerning declaring candidates ineligible, or applying mandamus to party chairs. No; I think TX is the key to ‘outing’ the election (ballot) fraud that permeated the 2008 election cycle, and can prevent a repeat in 2012.