The Right colludes with the Left on the expanded interpretation of “commerce” in Wickard v. Filburn because that also allows the War on Drugs without a constitutional Prohibition amendment.
You won’t get other freedoms back until that alliance is ended.
“The Right colludes with the Left on the expanded interpretation of ‘commerce’ in Wickard v. Filburn because that also allows the War on Drugs without a constitutional Prohibition amendment”
Not everyone on “the Right” agrees with the “War on Drugs.” I, for one, think it’s a pretty clear sign of evil whenever they call something that’s not a war a war. As they say, “war is the health of the state.” Which is fine when there’s an outside threat to defeat with arms; that’s what government’s for. It’s not fine when the health of the state is preserved by fighting our fellow citizens (when said fellows aren’t in rebellion, that is).