Two interesting things on my Chicago Cook County BC. First, it asks if the mother was tested for Syphilis. Second, it asks if the birth was legitimate. Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm!
I wish someone, anyone who was born in Hawaii would spend the money to order their original birth certificate from the Hawaii Department of Health and that they would then post it on the internet, just to embarrass Obama into doing the same thing.
Thus far no one that I know of has done that and the state says that you can’t get the a copy of the original from them any longer. They say that since 2001 only the computerized Certification of Live Birth version is available.
The Hawaii Department of Health has confirmed that the Factcheck COLB is fraudulent, because
1) The HDOH made a statutory admission (and repeated it multiple times when asked about it) that Obama’s birth certificate has been amended. DOH administrative rules (which were illegally hidden from the public until Nov of 2009) say that all birth certificates (which includes the abbreviated certificate, or COLB) must note amendments. Since Factcheck doesn’t note the amendment we know it is a forgery. And
2) Janice Okubo has stated that all Oahu birth certificates have always been received by the state registrar and given a number by the state registrar on the same day - the “date filed”. The Factcheck COLB has a “date filed” 3 days before the Nordyke twins’ but a certificate number 2 later than theirs. In the past this has been explained by hospitals having pre-numbered certificates or by piles of BC’s sitting at different secretaries’ desks for 3 days awaiting processing. But Okubo has directly eliminated those explanations. Because the “date filed” and certificate number are incompatible we know that at least one or the other has been altered and the COLB is thus a forgery.
Hawaii Revised Statute 338-17 says that an amended birth certificate doesn’t qualify as prima facie evidence; it is mere legal hearsay - with the same probative value as the Kenyan birth certificates unless and until they are certified as authentic. DOH rules require an administrative or judicial person or body to view all supporting documents when an amended birth certificate is presented as evidence, because Hawaii doesn’t vouch for the accuracy of the claims.
The reason that Obama posted the forged COLB instead of the genuine one he has in his possession is because there are 2 items he needs to hide:
1) the certificate number of 151-2006-xxxxxx (which shows that he forged the certificate number AND that his BC was only completed in 2006); and
2) the note of the amendment, which means that the certificate is not prima facie evidence and the burden of proof thus falls on Obama to prove that the claims on the BC are accurate - rather than someone else to prove them false. That’s some serious doo-doo for him.
What poses a serious problem for him is that the amendment he made in 2006 appears to be to the medical portion of the birth certificate, which would only be necessary if a Hawaii doctor did not examine Obama within the first 30 days after the birth and complete the certificate. This amendment begs the question of where Obama was at birth if a Hawaii doctor couldn’t see him within 30 days.
Any legal proceeding would require Obama to show the genuine COLB, which would then require him to show the genuine original and all the supporting documents. Obama knows that if he has to do that, he’s toast. That’s why he is fighting the lawsuits so hard and why he will rescind military orders rather than allow a soldier to reach the discovery stage of a legal proceeding.
That’s why Lt Col Lakin’s stand is so vital - because he can’t simply be dismissed, and if he is found guilty in the military without being given a chance to defend himself via discovery, he can take it to federal court, with standing.
Documentation is at http://butterdezillion.wordpress.com/2010/01/11/red-flags-in-hawaii-2/
obumpa
The issue of Obama’s eligiblity is NOT about the Birth Certificate. The Birth Certificate is a “Red Herring”. While it may in fact be true that Obama SR. proudly declared himself to be an Arab, it has no bearing on the eligiblity issue, and bringing this into it will only muddy the waters, and bring more charges of racism.
Looking at the Certificates of Live Birth, issued to the Nordyke twins, who were born on August 5, 1961, there is no space on the documents listing the religion of either parent, so there is no reason to expect Obama’s would be any different.
The Obama’s father was NOT a US citizen, this is a fact commonly known around the entire globe, and it is this fact that makes Obama ineligible for office-Not the fact that he won’t release his original Birth Certificate.
The US Supreme Court has used the term “Natural Born Citizen” in a number of it’s rulings, and regardless of the subject matter of the case, the definition used in every case has always been the same - “Natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens.” Only an unreasonable person would expect the definition of the phrase “Natural Born citizen” would change when applied to Obama.
ping
You may also find this of interest:
Trinity people aren’t speaking up either because they don’t want to be the one to stop the first black president or they are scared to talk.
http://www.hillaryclintonforum.net/discussion/showthread.php?t=18616
HillBuzzBlogspotCom wrote: June 30th, 04:15 PM
Adrienne – I told you exactly what I have been told by people in the gay community here who have said there are definite open secrets about BHO.
I’ve never remarked on the Sinclair stuff for one solid reason: it does not make sense with what the gay community in Chicago tells me.
Not saying it couldn’t be true, but that’s not BHOs’ M.O. here.
Being on the down-low means you only fool around with other married guys on the down-low, and there are enough successful, wealthy down-low members of Trinity, who are married, and thus have as much to lose if they rat out the other guy who is on the downlow.
Some are athletes, some are other high profile men in the community, and some are not even members of the church, but elected officials themselves, in other states (that start with “M”, like in Michelle) or other cities (that start with “B”, like in beard).
The people I have spoken to who know Trinity well, and know open secrets well, say people aren’t speaking up either because they don’t want to be the one to stop the first black president or they are scared to talk….
HOWEVER, they said they are positive that, after he would become President, that the open secret will no longer be a secret, and that the carefully-arranged down-low secret pacts will collapse, because the media will have an incentive to create the most sensational sex scandal to ever hit the White House: the first bisexual president.
In short — and let’s see if this clears things up — there are people who know open-secrets who are staying quiet because outing a presidential candidate is not something they want to do, but outing a president, and exposing him as a bisexual, would be something they’d see as important, because it’s a step towards having an openly gay president.
Think James McGreevey….yes, his administration collapsed when he came out, and he came out only because his affair was being telegraphed, but McGreevey still served, briefly, as an openly gay US governor.
That’s a step towards having other openly gay governors in the future — ones not tainted with scandal, preferably.
Outing Obama as a candidate will keep him from being elected….outing him if he becomes President means the US will have its first outed bisexual/gay president.
There is no putting that genie back in its bottle.
I don’t agree with any of this Adrienne….I am just telling you what I hear on a regular basis here in Chicago.