Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: bronxville

Why?

Because the Hoax was the perfect cover for seizure of freedoms and imposition of communism/socialism.


2 posted on 04/25/2010 10:54:30 PM PDT by FormerACLUmember ("Subtlety is not going to win this fight": NJ Governor Chris Christie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: FormerACLUmember

Yes, I wondered about the who, what, why’s...

“There is an even greater threat that scientists can only speculate about. As global temperatures rise, they may cause the massive West Antarctic ice sheet to slip more rapidly. Then we’ll be facing a sea-level rise not of one to three feet in a century, but of 10 or 20 feet in a much shorter time. The Supreme Court would be flooded. You could tie your boat to the Washington Monument. Storm surges would make the Capitol unusable. For Today, Paul Ehrlich in Washington, DC, on the future shoreline of Chesapeake Bay.”
— Paul Ehrlich acting as a news correspondent for NBC in May 1989
http://www.businessandmedia.org/specialreports/2007/globalwarming/ClimateOfBias.asp

I wonder if this is the same Czar Paul Ehrlich?


4 posted on 04/25/2010 11:09:26 PM PDT by bronxville
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: FormerACLUmember
Why?

The bottom line: Money, money, money, money, money, money, money, carbon money, old money, new money, State money, Federal money, Grant money, Tax money, Your money, My money, Corporate money, private money, play money, advertsing money, stolen money, Algore's money, Soros' money, our grandchildrens' money, fiat money, real money, funny money, foreign money, domestic money, money, money, money, money, money, money....

12 posted on 04/26/2010 12:03:24 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: FormerACLUmember

I posted this two years ago on pretty much the same kind of article. Can’t be posted enough to show their agenda.


It’s been posted before but I’ll do it again, just to show the hypocrisy and outright lying the envirowackos and globull warming advocates do all the time- in their own words:

“I think if we don’t overthrow capitalism, we don’t have a chance of saving the world ecologically. I think it is possible to have an ecologically sound society under socialism. I don’t think it’s possible under capitalism.”
—Judi Bari, Earth First! member.
[Environmentalism equals replacing capitalism with socialism.]

“The environmentalist’s dream is an egalitarian society, based on rejection of economic growth, a smaller population, eating lower on the food chain, consuming a lot less, and sharing a much lower level of resources much more equally.”
—Aaron Wildavsky, political scientist and professor.
[Environmentalism equals making everybody equal; that is, it’s communism.]

“No matter if the science is all phony, there are collateral environmental benefits... [C]limate change [provides] the greatest chance to bring about justice and equality in the world.”
—Christine Stewart, Canadian Environment Minister.
[Environmentalism equals changing the world.]

“We must make this an insecure and inhospitable place for capitalists, and their projects... We must reclaim the roads and plowed land, halt dam construction, tear down existing dams, free shackled rivers, and return to wilderness millions of tens of millions of acres of presently settled land.”
—David Foreman, EarthFirst! member.
[Environmentalism equals a return to primitive living.]

“We’ve got to ride the global-warming issue. Even if the theory of global warming is wrong, we will be doing the right thing, in terms of economic policy and environmental policy
—Timothy Wirth, Clinton Administration U.S. Under Secretary of State for Global Affairs, and one of a number of politicians (including Barbara Boxer, Barney Frank, Al Gore, John Kerry, Christopher Shays, and others) who were designated as “Green Leadership for the ‘90s.”
[Environmentalism equals changing policy by claiming ? even without substantiation ? it’s necessary to save the world’s environment.]

“[W]e have to offer up scary scenarios [about global warming and destruction of the environment], make simplified, dramatic statements, and make little mention of any doubts one might have... Each of us has to decide what the right balance is between being effective and being honest.”
—Stephen Schneider, Stanford University environmentalist.
[Environmentalism equals lies “if necessary.”]

“We routinely wrote scare stories about the hazards of chemicals, employing words like “cancer,” and “birth defects” to splash a little cold water in reporters’ faces... Our press reports were more or less true... Few handouts, however, can be completely honest, and ours were no exception... We were out to whip the public into a frenzy about the environment.”
—Jim Sibbison, former EPA press officer.
[Environmentalism equals government-sponsored deception.]

“Not only do journalists not have a responsibility to report what skeptical scientists have to say about global warming, they have a responsibility not to report what these scientists say.”
—Ross Gelbspan, former editor of The Boston Globe.
[Environmentalism equals silencing debate, and stifling contrary opinions.]

“I would freely admit that on [global warming] we have crossed the boundary from news reporting to advocacy.”
—Charles Alexander, Time magazine science editor.
[Environmentalism equals indoctrination.]


22 posted on 04/26/2010 9:07:35 AM PDT by hadit2here ("Most men would rather die than think. Many do." - Bertrand Russell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson