[deport]

Difference is one is nominated the other isn’t and won’t be by Obama....

[boycott]

Laura Ingraham would be much easier on the eyes too.

[marron]

Ann Coulter on the Supreme Court?

I’m in.

[bmwcyle]

If Kagan is Qualified for the Supreme Court, So is Laura Ingraham

Laura is more qualified.

[marron]

While I would prefer someone who has been a judge, in the end the number one, non-negotiable litmus test for anyone to sit on the Supreme Court is a willingness to uphold the constitution. If you are not a constitutionalist you have no business anywhere near the Supreme Court.

The issue isn’t experience. The issue is fitness based on your fealty to the constitution, your faithfulness and intent to remain true to it. No one can show me Kagan’s bona fides as a constitutionalist and it is based on this that she must be voted down. She should never have been put forward and no president who cared a fig about the constitution would ever have nominated her. She is an embarrassment.

[libbylu]

Laura is more qualified . . . she has the right stuff.

[Bahbah]

nor appeared as a lawyer before the Supreme Court

Actually, she has, in the Citizens United case. She was pretty much a disaster.

[thinkin out loud]

I’d rather he nominated Laura..... This nomination does not bode well ( but then neither did the Sotomayor nomination)

[laweeks]

Is Nobama qualified to be president . . . that’s a better question.

[Bullish]

If Kagan is qualified for the Supreme Court so is the Burger King.

[tlb]

There is no requirement a Justice be a Judge first. President Taft was later confirmed as Chief Justice, and I don’t think he ever clerked for anybody. I don’t really see the sense of this article.