Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Will Comcast Purchase Of NBC Universal Lead To Change In Network News Division's Liberal Agenda?
Illinois Family Institute ^ | May 4, 2010 | Daniel T. Zanoza

Posted on 05/11/2010 6:04:22 AM PDT by Daniel T. Zanoza

Comcast, a giant media conglomerate, is currently in the process of purchasing NBC Universal. Comcast is the nation's largest cable service provider, serving 39 states and the District of Columbia. When negotiations are completed, Comcast will have controlling interest of the NBC network, its News Division and NBC Universal's cable networks--which include MSNBC and CNBC. The deal's price tag is an estimated $30 billion.

Besides the business aspects regarding Comcast's acquisition of NBC Universal, which I won't go into here, some speculate Comcast's controlling interests of NBC Universal may lead to a huge shake-up in the management of its news division and address what many refer to as NBC's liberal agenda. One hint of NBC's change in its news content may have become evident when, earlier this month, one of its major news anchors, the controversial David Shuster, was suspended indefinitely for reported behind the scenes negotiations with cable news rival, CNN. For years, NBC has been criticized for liberal bias in its news content, and there may be indications other on-air personalities may also be looking for employment elsewhere when the Comcast deal is finalized.

The NBC News Division, including MSNBC and CNBC, have been losing millions of dollars for NBC Universal. For example, MSNBC consistently comes in dead last in viewer ratings. On the other hand, cable news rival, the FOX News Channel, has a viewing audience which trounces its competition nightly. Indeed, MSNBC, CNBC and CNN viewership combined do not equal the ratings of Fox News.

NBC Universal is currently owned by General Electric (GE) whose Chairman and CEO, Jeffrey Immelt, has been accused of having a conflict of interest involving possible government deals--much of this involving green technology. Some say GE has been put on the fast track regarding giant profits which would result from legislation like Cap and Trade, if the bill were ever passed into law by Congress. Therefore, GE has devoted significant resources towards the development of alternative energy. Some assert Immelt has supported left-leaning political policies which would directly benefit his corporation, and the conduit for doing so was through the utilization of NBC Universal's news division.

MSNBC's on-air personalities have drawn the ire of conservatives who see the network as a major proponent of a liberal agenda. From primetime network programming, which includes Hardball with Chris Matthews, Countdown with Keith Olbermann and the Rachel Maddow Show, many media observers believe such broadcasts would not be in the best interest of Comcast's bottom line when its purchase of NBC Universal is finalized.

Much criticism has been levied against MSNBC and rightly so. For example, after watching Barack Obama give a speech during his presidential campaign, Chris Matthews said Obama "sent shivers up his leg" (hardly objective). Keith Olbermann once referred to President George W. Bush as a "Pathological Liar or Idiot-in-Chief". Out-of-the-closet lesbian Rachel Maddow advances a political agenda which even the most objective of viewers would consider leftist in nature.

The underlying question is: Will Comcast--a corporation which sells its product to not only conservatives, but liberals as well--be willing to take the political heat from a public which it depends on for revenue?

"When the Comcast deal finally goes through, some heads might roll across the board at NBC," said a high-ranking member of management for the network who requested anonymity. "Over the top shows, like that featured in MSNBC's primetime programming, may soon become a thing of the past."

Comcast, which offers a product, is in business to make a profit. Whether a corporation is connected with a particular agenda, be it left or right, that corporation has to look to their bottom line. Subsequently, those who use the Comcast product may have an influence regarding the political content of the news divisions at NBC, MSNBC and CNBC once the acquisition is completed. Therefore, liberal bomb throwers, including Olbermann and Maddow may soon be seeking employment elsewhere. Imagine if Comcast subscribers decided to boycott the country's number one cable provider because of such programming which alienates a significant segment of its customers. After all, recent polling indicates 50% of Americans now refer to themselves as conservatives. Most certainly, Comcast's Chief Executive, Brian Roberts, is aware of this reality.

Comcast's affiliation with NBC Universal may have an impact far beyond its control of NBC's News Division. If Comcast provides more balance concerning NBC's news coverage, it is possible the NBC News Division would be more financially successful and, more importantly, provide a more honest news product for the country.

Of course, Comcast's ownership of NBC Universal may have no impact at all regarding how the news is presented on NBC in the future. However, surely Comcast desires to make NBC and its cable affiliates competitive. If so, the beneficiaries will not only be Comcast, but the American people as well.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; TV/Movies
KEYWORDS: comcast; keitholbermann; mediabias; nbcuniversal
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

1 posted on 05/11/2010 6:04:23 AM PDT by Daniel T. Zanoza
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Daniel T. Zanoza

Probably not.


2 posted on 05/11/2010 6:10:35 AM PDT by Wilderness Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Daniel T. Zanoza

I look for BO to jump ship from Fox to the ‘New’ NBC....


3 posted on 05/11/2010 6:12:15 AM PDT by devane617 (VOTE THEM OUT! ALL OF THEM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Daniel T. Zanoza

Doubt it.
They might make some changes to MSNBC in order to get viewers though. lol.


4 posted on 05/11/2010 6:13:24 AM PDT by GeronL (http://tyrannysentinel.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Daniel T. Zanoza

I want to wring the collective necks of Comcast now as it is.


5 posted on 05/11/2010 6:13:30 AM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

bump


6 posted on 05/11/2010 6:13:44 AM PDT by GeronL (http://tyrannysentinel.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Daniel T. Zanoza

I worked for Comcast. I know several others that still work for Comcast in Senior management positions. The answer to your question, based on personal experience is this:

IF they make a profit, Comcast will leave them pretty much alone. If they do not, they will change.

Comcast is concerned with making money; they know what they know...and they know what they don’t know. They are smart guys.


7 posted on 05/11/2010 6:15:27 AM PDT by Vermont Lt (This nation, of the people, by the people, and for the people has perished from the land.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Daniel T. Zanoza

Suppose their will be weeping wailing and gnashing of teeth?


8 posted on 05/11/2010 6:16:22 AM PDT by wita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt

So...no more money losing Olympic coverage, then ?


9 posted on 05/11/2010 6:18:32 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (Impeachment !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

I would think you would see a lot more “cable” coverage of the Olympics. But I doubt if they will make money on many “new” contracts. The existing ones must already be figured into the pot.


10 posted on 05/11/2010 6:25:11 AM PDT by Vermont Lt (This nation, of the people, by the people, and for the people has perished from the land.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt

MSNBC and CNBC aren’t exactly rocking the charts in viewer ratings. Greater balance would bring more viewers. That’s a fact.


11 posted on 05/11/2010 6:27:08 AM PDT by Daniel T. Zanoza
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Daniel T. Zanoza

I doubt it. But.... if they were to toss out Matthews, Olberman and Maddow, I would give them a chance.


12 posted on 05/11/2010 6:27:46 AM PDT by jersey117
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jersey117

How much fun would it be to hear Meltdown the night the Keith takes his now boss to task for censoring him...


13 posted on 05/11/2010 6:31:22 AM PDT by LearnsFromMistakes (Tag line deleted...don't want to incite violence...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Daniel T. Zanoza

It will lead to higher fees for viewers as Comcast rapes its competitors for program costs....with full approval of The Regime.


14 posted on 05/11/2010 6:33:57 AM PDT by clintonh8r (Times Square: A law enforcement success made possible by an intellingence failure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jersey117
I doubt it. But.... if they were to toss out Matthews, Olberman and Maddow, I would give them a chance.

Watch for them to dump one of the three in a big "We are moving to the middle" PR campaign. But they really won't change. My bet is on Olberman. He can't be controlled and would destroy the credibility of any PR move. So they will dump Olberman, Chrissy the sissy will go to bashing everyone, like he did during the Clinton impeachment. Maddow will be moved opposite Beck to be a socialist counterpoint to his libertarian rants.
15 posted on 05/11/2010 6:39:47 AM PDT by GonzoGOP (There are millions of paranoid people in the world and they are all out to get me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Daniel T. Zanoza
NBC attempts to give their chosen target market what they want. Their target market is, of course, flaming liberals; and since somewhere around half the country leans that way, it would be a great niche market strategy except for the fact that CNN, ABC, and CBS are after the same viewer.

Thus, they all lose money.

Right now, if NBC ticks off a viewer with their viewpoint, the loss is just that, viewership. If Comcast, after purchasing NBC, angers a viewer due to political bent, the viewer can discontinue cable, I would think a much greater loss of revenue. So I believe the author's thesis to be correct, that if Comcast buys NBC, its political lean will have to change.

16 posted on 05/11/2010 6:46:10 AM PDT by wayoverontheright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Daniel T. Zanoza

Not as long as all broadcast is at the mercy of the O cabal.


17 posted on 05/11/2010 6:46:36 AM PDT by Carley (WE CAN SEE NOVEMBER FROM OUR HOUSE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: clintonh8r

I feel like they pulled a fast one on me with the digital switch.

I went out and bought a digital flatscreen TV and figured I would be fine despite the fact that they told me I would need the converter.

Turns out that I didn’t need the converter.....at first. I started out with more channels than I had before with the old TV and I also had several HD channels. Then last weekend I woke up and no longer had FOX news and several of the other channels I normally watch.

I called comcast and they told me that it was because I didn’t have the box connected. I connected the box and found FOX and the channels I was looking for but the box doesn’t allow the HD channels (They said I need a different box for those).

I’ve got all the channels I had (incl HD) but it requires that I disconnect the box to get the extra channels but when the box is disconnected I don’t get FOX and several others.


18 posted on 05/11/2010 6:56:06 AM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: devane617

That would mean that there is a GOD.


19 posted on 05/11/2010 6:56:28 AM PDT by Rappini ("Pro deo et Patria.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

I fired Comcast years ago. I found them to be the most arrogant, unresponsive company I’d ever dealt with. They are a textbook case study for why monopolies are a bad thing.


20 posted on 05/11/2010 7:09:01 AM PDT by clintonh8r (Times Square: A law enforcement success made possible by an intellingence failure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson