Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: The Pack Knight
Come on, do you seriously think “that may be born beyond sea, or out of the limits of the United States” means that provision also applies to children born inside the United States?

Are you going to tell us that it meant that only children of citizens born beyond the sea were to be considered natural born citizens???

It doesn't say "that are". It says "that may" which widens their definition from what it was to something more involving possibility, or chance. So then what was it before they added "that may ..."???

82 posted on 05/14/2010 10:06:35 AM PDT by Uncle Chip (TRUTH : Ignore it. Deride it. Allegorize it. Interpret it. But you can't ESCAPE it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]


To: Uncle Chip

The Naturalization Act of 1790 clearly did not address the citizenship of those born in the United States. That was determined by common law. It only extended natural born citizenship to those born outside of the United States to citizen parents.

I don’t see how you can honestly read it any other way.


89 posted on 05/14/2010 8:32:57 PM PDT by The Pack Knight (Duty, Honor, Country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson