Male epistemology doesn’t exist without female epistemology to declare it.
Otherwise, it’s just epistemology.
And ultimately, the validity of any epistemology is in it’s repeatable predictive ability.
Sexualization creates an arbitrary, limiting conflict.
Without sexualization, parallel, valid epistemologies can be studied to find a more profound epistemology that contains both.
Yeah, but will using those statements as a pickup line in a bar, help you get lucky?