Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: calcowgirl; sten
Go find out what was really said.

No one called her a Nazi.

I’m so sick of this Hillary-the-Victim type crap.


The statement by Brown was made concerning Whitman. Here is the quote from the "journalist" who broke the story:

"I never wrote that Brown called Meg Whitman a Nazi, or compared her or her campaign to Nazis. I simply reported his words, in which he likens her advertising approach to the propaganda techniques used by Goebbels. I leave it to others to draw their own conclusions. I am not responsible for the headline-writing or media shorthand of other organizations. You never heard "Brown Calls Whitman A Nazi" on KCBS, because we never said it that way, and that's not how we operate."
7 posted on 06/13/2010 11:33:58 PM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: SoConPubbie

“he [Brown] likens her [Whitman’s] advertising approach to the propaganda techniques used by Goebbels.”

No, Brown made a rational statement in which he didn’t call her a Nazi directly, he equilibrated her to one.

Before this campaign is over, Meg should return the favor. She can do it substantively with evidence, and equilibrate former governor Brown’s consequences to the state of California to those upon Russia by Lenin.

There is one thing stopping Meg from doing that. What is it?


10 posted on 06/14/2010 3:11:43 PM PDT by Avoiding_Sulla (Yesterday's Left = today's status quo. Thus CONSERVATIVE is a conflicted label for battling tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson