Hawaii elections official victim of vicious smears 'They have failed quite miserably"

World Net Daily ^ | June 28, 2010 | Joe Kovacs

[Polarik]

Stick to chasing ambulances: that is the only thing you’re minimally qualified to do.

[LorenC]

The topic of the hearing was not McCain's eligibility. It was about homeland security. At the very end, Leahy asked an off-topic question about Chertoff's opinion regarding the citizenship status of babies born to US citizen parents abroad, and Chertoff answered that he believed them to be natural born.

Pshaw. You think that when someone says "the Senate held hearings about X" that that actually means the Senate held more than one hearing devoted to that subject? That's such a limiting interpretation.

No, the clearly superior meaning of "the Senate held hearings about X" is 'at least one question was asked about X during any Senate hearing.'

This is why, according to Birther logic, it's equally fair to say that the U.S. Senate held hearings about whether Guam will tip over.

Similarly, perhaps we should just forget how every time Birthers bring up these "hearings," they inevitably misrepresent what happened at them. They'll say the Senate "debated and investigated" McCain's eligibility, or that McCain himself testified, or that McCain presented documents to the Senate, etc., even though none of that ever happened. This is why you end up with Birthers debating the meaning of "hearing"; so much of what they say happened at the "hearings" is unambiguously false, and since they'd prefer to avoid admitting that, they change the subject to arguing terminology.

[Quix]

GOODNESS!

IMPRESSIVE.

GOD BE WITH YOU BRO.

Watch your back! What a stinking pile of stuff to have to contend with.

God’s Peace, provision, protection and hope to you.

[Brown Deer]

This should keep the boy busy. Can’t wait to see Loren’s qualifications and answers.

[little jeremiah]

Placemark and BTTT.

[azishot]

I’d say that you cleared the air rather nicely. About half way through, I had to remind myself to breathe!

Can’t wait to see how he (or his *friends*) responds.

[Brown Deer]

Why was a post containing only 2008 election results from Georgia's 4th Congressional District removed?

[Jim Robinson]

you have mail

[Polarik]

Can you describe the contents of #69, #70, & #71 without getting your comment zotted?

[Brown Deer]

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1732260/posts?page=100#100

[Polarik]

How delightful...

[Polarik]

Here are two animated image comparisons that will be of interest to the group.

They were made from a pair of 2007 COLB copies printed for the same person, at the same time. Consequently, these two copies were printed, back-to-back.

In Chapter 1-4, one of the things I demonstrated was how the paper pattern in the "security paper" of the "COLB" shown in Factcheck "Photo #2" did not match the paper pattern in the "security paper" of the "COLB" shown in Factcheck's "scan image."

The forger did not know - and neither did anyone else - that the patterns in the security paper run at an angle relative to the paper's edges. Consequently, at the paper mill, where paper rolls were cut into sheets, the starting point in the patterns of each sheet - relative to its edges - varies from sheet to sheet.

To put it another way, the patterns do not run parallel to the left and right edges, and do not run perpendicular to the top and bottom edges.

Not only does the pattern change from COLB to COLB, so does the placement of the Seal and the stamps - which were applied to the COLB by hand.

Lower right-hand corner - notice the shift in the horizontal patterns relative to the bottom edge :

Full page (folding of 2nd COLB done by owner):

[Brown Deer]

Very interesting. This also shows the paper background through the gray border.

The second gif is showing up blank.

[null and void]

Just to be thorough, does the basket weave pattern on the "real" 0bama birth certificate line up perfectly with the grey border?

In other words, were the border and the background weave printed at the same time, with exactly the same alignment, or was the document printed on a pre-printed standard form?

[azishot]

I remember reading about this back in my *lurker * days. Am I right?

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2066515/posts