The only thing I see wrong is she has to wait for him to ask a Question that goes on for too long setting up his scenario,then she attempts to answer and he interrupts with But But you will Have this and That,then she tries to say something and he Interrupts again and again.
She should have all scenarios down Pat by now and just let it fly like any Normal Politician and get her say in ,JUST IGNORE his question and get your main point out and Let the Irrelevant Blow Hard Ramble. I felt that she had to let him Lead her on with the Questions,Just YOUR Policy out Period and forget The Blowhards Agenda
I agree. She was - well - too polite, I guess, in that sense. I don’t like it when guests don’t answer the question, but in O’Reilly’s case, you’re right, the guests just need to say what they have to say and let him get indignant about it.
Off topic, but I have to wonder if he actually believes half of the things he says. I hope not, but I fear he does.
The reason why O was interrupting Palin is because she has a habit of meandering in her comments making it sound like she is answering when she isn’t even saying anything. People are complaining all over the internet that Fox just lets her do her rambling without any follow up questions. Fox News Credibility is on the line because they are starting to seem like they have made it their mission to get Palin elected by handling her with kid gloves. People don’t like it because it is unfair. I have stopped writting on the FreeRepublic for a long time because I got tired of saying the same stuff over and over. People have a right to like who they want to, but meanwhile, O is a little concerned about his own reputation. This guy was a Harvard Education English Teacher. It matters to him if he has credibility. He can’t allow Palin to continue to destroy his reputation. You might not like to hear it, but it’s the truth. You can also vote for Palin, that’s you right, but facts are facts.