Please read my post, follow the references. You’ll see it’s documented to be economical at $20-$25 per barrel. Exxon, RAND, and others make the case with actual science and facts.
But you’re the master of lack-of-facts, just stating something and leaving it at that. Peak oil is a myth, high speed rail is WAY too expensive for the US to consider.
Go ahead, Willie - how about justifying a $376 per TRIP subsidy. Or show me where my numbers are wrong. Put some facts down on paper, prove your case. Or simply be shown - once again - to be an empty-headed shill for trains.
Will confronted with facts deeper than the first page of a lefty ‘intermodal’ site, Willie just does a Judy Garland, clinks his heels and moves on with his little train, Toto.
Please read my post, follow the references. You’ll see it’s documented to be economical at $20-$25 per barrel. Exxon, RAND, and others make the case with actual science and facts.
The RAND study you cite actually says "US$70–95 adjusted to 2005 values", but serves as an illustration to others as how you cherry-pick information and then play a mix & match shell game with the data to misrepresent the facts.