The late Michael Crichton said much the same thing in his lecture "Aliens Cause Global Warming".
Let's be clear: the work of science has nothing whatever to do with consensus. Consensus is the business of politics. Science, on the contrary, requires only one investigator who happens to be right, which means that he or she has results that are verifiable by reference to the real world. In science consensus is irrelevant. What is relevant is reproducible results. The greatest scientists in history are great precisely because they broke with the consensus.There is no such thing as consensus science. If it's consensus, it isn't science. If it's science, it isn't consensus. Period.
If we were dependent on consensus for science, we would all be using Aristotelian Science. The left wants to undo the Scientific Method and Renaissance since it brings into question their religion of choice.
Great post.