Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: hoosiermama

Corrected (knuckles sore) But what was the problem w/ the original suit? No standing w/ the Court?

Hope you are right .


21 posted on 07/29/2010 1:48:31 PM PDT by Vinnie (You're Nobody 'Til Somebody Jihads You)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: Vinnie
Standing is an “arbitrary” (in the legal sense) term originated by the judicial system to make their calendars run more smoothly. It is NOT a judicial ruling.

Since the progressives have used case based decisions the rule of the day, a case using original____(can't remember the word but it means source) or the constitution is almost unheard of, but IT IS still the foundation for the check/balance system that the founders devised.

None of the lower courts will make a ruling because it is not case based, they will rule so that the SCOTUS makes the decision. Even "Discovery" may wait until the very last...as not to confuse the issues. The SCOTUS is waiting until they get the case that has the correct plaintiff, defendants and premise....It's coming. At that time they will take other cases off the table and in their final conclusion explain each case position in the total picture.

(For example one of the cases is against the SoS of various states...They are not guilty because no one has made the checking of qualification part of their job description....That still doesn't qualify BO, although a ruling to that would make him seem not guilty) So they tabled it.

22 posted on 07/29/2010 3:27:03 PM PDT by hoosiermama (ONLY DEAD FISH GO WITH THE FLOW.......I am swimming with Sarahcudah! Sarah has read the tealeaves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson