To: MaxCUA
“Once the fuel rods are loaded, Bolton told Fox News on Friday afternoon, “it makes it essentially immune from attack by Israel. Because once the rods are in the reactor an attack on the reactor risks spreading radiation in the air, and perhaps into the water of the Persian Gulf.”
I’m not sure this is that much of a consideration.
2 posted on
08/13/2010 3:15:31 PM PDT by
DonaldC
(A nation cannot stand in the absence of religious principle.)
To: DonaldC
I agree. You can learn a lot from the Russians (Chernobyl).
4 posted on
08/13/2010 3:18:18 PM PDT by
battlecry
To: DonaldC
Either the US, Israel or some Joint Allied Force will attack before the rods are loaded, or will never attack thereafter.
Nuke pollution is bad press...
7 posted on
08/13/2010 3:22:42 PM PDT by
Mariner
(USS Tarawa, VQ3, USS Benjamin Stoddert, NAVCAMS WestPac, 7th Fleet, Navcommsta Puget Sound)
To: DonaldC
I don't think that the presence of the fuel rods would necessarily cause widespread contamination from bombing the reactor. A solid hit would basically break up the nuclear core and hopefully it would not remain critical. There would be some radioactive steam from the cooling system.
Locally, the site would be a mess. Just pour concrete over it; it's done. There's no point in sending in a repair/cleanup crew...the ones in Chernobyl died, and they still had to pour concrete over it.
47 posted on
08/16/2010 11:31:18 AM PDT by
Sender
(It's never too late to be who you could have been.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson