Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Gemsbok

Interesting observation. Does anybody remember reading that part? I’ve read parts of the book but had a hard time not gagging, to be honest.

There are other things I believe Ayers put in there deliberately as well, including an alleged birth weight. Someday those things are going to come back to haunt him and Obama.

The folks at the Passport Office already know, right now, whether SAD had a passport in 1961. They’ve got the index records for all passports ever issued. They’re not telling, and I’m sure there’s a reason they’re not telling.


45 posted on 08/27/2010 10:52:24 AM PDT by butterdezillion (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]


To: butterdezillion

I agree with your comments and want clarify. From memory, I recall others siting an excerpt where he deliberately stated that it was his and her FIRST time to ever get a passport.

Now why would anyone include such comments? Certainly it wasn’t with the intention of boring the reader!
Who writes about their BC to begin with? Or recites their birth weight to back up the odd comment with detail? Or informs the reader about walking the neighborhood with “Pops” past the hospital mentioning where he was supposedly birthed? Funny how Pops didn’t remind his dear son about the fond memory of carrying the sweet baby bundle from that same hospital 10 years before. It would have been an obvious ground of commonality following a ten-year period of child abandonment.

Who includes those kind of details? Only someone with a deviant ulterior motive that is seeking desperately to substantiate a fabricated past that is intended to deceive the reader (voter).

But the brightest red-flag (no pun intended) of the candidacy period was when it became well known that Hill-Bill’s people were attempting to verify his Kindergarten attendance and records. And he publicly taunted Hillary for this during his primary campaign.

It must be very frustrating to be Hill-Bill. She should have recognized his star-power in 2004 and noted his super-tracked ascension up the party ladder. They should have shelled out some good money and investigated him at that earlier time while there were still some scraps of evidence around. They know he’s a fraud, had the means to investigate him, yet failed in their attempts to ferret out the truth.

Now that we can look back at the D primary and the race, it is obvious that the financiers used her for cover since she was presented to be the face of the party and forerunner of the race. While she was spot-lighted, the big D money and foreign money was on him right from the beginning. It was well solidified and basically complete after his trip to Damascus. The organizational structure and design to cheat her out of caucuses and primary elections in selected states was very well orchestrated by certain someones. hmm..hmm..hmmm.


46 posted on 08/27/2010 12:14:15 PM PDT by Gemsbok (Dead men tell no tales!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson