Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: abigail2

Come on folks. This article is over the top. If it were a post on FR there would be a “tin foil hat” sign on it.

First, Obama citing the AZ SB1070 law in his report on Human Rights is not the same as hauling Arizona in front of the U.N. This is an infantile analysis.

Secondly, even if it were an invitation for the U.N. to start action against Arizona during October there would be NO political gain to be made. If that were the case, the Democrats would lose closer to 150 seats in the House.

Get real and worry about actual threats.


21 posted on 08/28/2010 8:48:59 PM PDT by the_Watchman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: the_Watchman

It is over the top. The fact that an “American President” would even mention this like its dirty laundry is equally over the top.

Trying to rally international opinion to shore up an untenable federal position in clear defiance of national mandimus to the contrary is way, way over the top, dude.


26 posted on 08/28/2010 9:02:28 PM PDT by One Name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: the_Watchman

Set a benchmark for yourself. What would Obama have to do for you to recognize that he is seeking the fall of the US?If you can delineate one monumental act of treason then...watch for it.


32 posted on 08/28/2010 9:10:51 PM PDT by Louis Foxwell (They are the vultures of Dark Crystal screeeching their hatred and fear into the void ....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: the_Watchman
Obama citing the AZ SB1070 law in his report on Human Rights is not the same as hauling Arizona in front of the U.N.

Sorry, I'm one of the knuckle-dragging neanderthals who frequent this site.

I'd appreciate if you could explain-- and please consider our deficient mental capacity-- how "citing the AZ SB1070 law in his report on Human Rights is not the same as hauling Arizona in front of the U.N."

And also, please explain why it is any of their Goddamn business.

Enlighten us.

Many thanks.

37 posted on 08/28/2010 9:19:04 PM PDT by tsomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: the_Watchman
if it were an invitation for the U.N. to start action against Arizona during October there would be NO political gain to be made.

Maybe a diversion? What is not said is what really needs to be of concern, What is said is only the open diversion...."ignore the man behind the curtain..".
42 posted on 08/28/2010 9:44:06 PM PDT by JSteff ((((It was ALL about SCOTUS. Most forget about that and HAVE DOOMED us for a generation or more.))))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: the_Watchman

Well, watchman, I’m glad you noticed that this article
was a rather gross jumping to conclusions that even the
Oblahblah Administration would not dare implement for real.
Keep in mind they’ve been doing lots of stuff like
this from Day ONE just to scare us into overreaction
so that they can then start the process of clamping
down.It hasn’t worked so far, and the more they try it
the more tiresome it generally gets to the American public.
It’s just wearying to be subjected to this constant battle of rhetoric not to mention these constant legal maneouevers issuing
from the Punks in the WHite House. It’s why the approval
ratings continue to slide downward. They ain;t goin’ up anytime soon.


62 posted on 08/29/2010 7:27:40 AM PDT by supremedoctrine ("Every election is like an advance auction sale of stolen goods"--H.L.Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson