Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

B-1 carries record-setting missile load
U.S. Air Force ^ | September 10, 2010 | Tech. Sgt. Robert Wollenberg

Posted on 09/10/2010 8:03:25 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last

A B-1 during a test of the Joint Air-to-Surface Stand-off Missiles (JASSM).

1 posted on 09/10/2010 8:03:26 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

To all or radical Muslim friends take note of this and quake in fear. It has been nine years since the 9/11 attacks. Never forget, never forgive the War continues.


2 posted on 09/10/2010 8:06:44 AM PDT by Destroyer Sailor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

I think this info was put out for the benefit of the chinese and other potential adversaries.


3 posted on 09/10/2010 8:07:14 AM PDT by refermech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

4 posted on 09/10/2010 8:09:19 AM PDT by AngelesCrestHighway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

This means, I reckon, that a squadron of B-1B Lancers, similarly armed, could ruin a pretty large target?

The Muzzies and the Chinese need to be scared of us. Not the other way around.

Good post. Good message.


5 posted on 09/10/2010 8:10:01 AM PDT by RexBeach ("There is no such thing as a good tax." Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: refermech

Not that Zero has any intention of actually using this.....


6 posted on 09/10/2010 8:10:14 AM PDT by njslim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Next stop ....... Iran??


7 posted on 09/10/2010 8:10:20 AM PDT by smokingfrog (freerepublic.com - Thanks JimRob! The flags are back! - 8/17/2010.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Kudos to you for posting this, from the home of the B-1.


8 posted on 09/10/2010 8:10:47 AM PDT by txrangerette ("...hold to the truth; speak without fear". - Glenn Beck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
Fortunately this B1B didn't accidently drop a JASSM into the Gulf and create an oil slick... then we'd need a 6-month flying moratorium on the Air Force.

/sarc

9 posted on 09/10/2010 8:12:48 AM PDT by DTogo (High time to bring back the Sons of Liberty !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Wasn’t the B-1 super-sonic in its original incarnation?


10 posted on 09/10/2010 8:15:17 AM PDT by ComputerGuy (HM2/USN M/3/3 Marines RVN '66-'67)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

Maybe for cleanup or advance operations to clear the radar traps. The big stick is yet to be tested as of my knowledge where they can deploy 5000 pounder bunker busters and in one case the newest MOAB.

But as from this article it can carry 24 1000 pound cruisers so one would be logically assume it could carry 5 or 6 of the super bunker busters. Imagine 5 or 6 of these being deployed in a cascading sequence at ther same target point.


11 posted on 09/10/2010 8:18:04 AM PDT by mazda77 (Rubio - US Senate, West FL22nd, Scott/Carroll - FL Gov/LtGov, Miller-AK US Senate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ComputerGuy
I believe that the current acknowleged top speed for the B1-B is 1.25 mach. That is lower than the mach 2+ for the B1-A, but it's still pretty fast for a big monster.

/johnny

12 posted on 09/10/2010 8:22:50 AM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

13 posted on 09/10/2010 8:23:45 AM PDT by AngelesCrestHighway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper

Roger that, thanks.


14 posted on 09/10/2010 8:24:07 AM PDT by ComputerGuy (HM2/USN M/3/3 Marines RVN '66-'67)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: mazda77

The JASSM weighs over 2,000 lbs.


15 posted on 09/10/2010 8:27:23 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Agreed. The warhead is a 1K explosives package. Add that the the propulsion, yadda, yadda, yadda and you get my point of easily 5 to 6 of the super busters. The most constrigent issue here is more of space and not weight I would assume.


16 posted on 09/10/2010 8:32:51 AM PDT by mazda77 (Rubio - US Senate, West FL22nd, Scott/Carroll - FL Gov/LtGov, Miller-AK US Senate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki; CholeraJoe; patton; CPOSharky; Doohickey

And so the USAF releases a press statement lauding the ability of ONE aircraft being able to take off and fly ONE (training) mission over the Gulf of Mexico fully loaded with 24 missiles by ONE crew at ONE base?

Now, a press release for a 1000 plane mission over Europe, each plane being fully fueled, fully armed with several rounds of machine gun ammo, and fully loaded with 20 bombs and taking off without collisions or explosions from 15 different airbases on a single morning ....

But we can’t do that any more.

[I fully grant that the many thousand “dumb” bombs dropped with heroic efforts near north Vietnamese bridges were less effective than one or two smart weapons dropped from one stealth plane flying only one mission; but still, consider what this press release really means.)


17 posted on 09/10/2010 8:34:24 AM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but socialists' ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Now if the Pentagon would just get their head out of their a$$es and make a B-1 Air to Air missile truck that could have fire control by the F-22 and F-35.


18 posted on 09/10/2010 8:38:18 AM PDT by mad_as_he$$ (Playing by the rules only works if both sides do it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ComputerGuy

Yes.


19 posted on 09/10/2010 8:39:08 AM PDT by mad_as_he$$ (Playing by the rules only works if both sides do it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE

The AF is a fine alternative to Military Service.


20 posted on 09/10/2010 8:40:26 AM PDT by patton (Obama has replaced "Res Publica" with "Quod licet Jovi non licet bovi.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson