To: La Enchiladita
The tea party is not a political party, it is an ideal.
Scott Brown was definitely a ‘tea party’ phenomenon because he was MORE CONSERVATIVE than his challenger.
That’s all it takes to be ‘tea party’, whether your opponent is Rebublican, Democrat or whatever.
10 posted on
09/14/2010 4:05:30 PM PDT by
Lorianne
(During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act. ___ George Orwell)
To: Lorianne
That is just too dishonest, too relativistic, for me to swallow. And the idea that the non-partisan ‘tea party’ can retroactively take credit for the Scott Brown phenomenon is disingenuous sophomoric nonsense.
12 posted on
09/14/2010 4:10:59 PM PDT by
La Enchiladita
(Where were you when the world stopped turning....?)
To: Lorianne
The tea party is not a political party, it is an ideal. Scott Brown was definitely a ‘tea party’ phenomenon because he was MORE CONSERVATIVE than his challenger. That’s all it takes to be ‘tea party’, whether your opponent is Rebublican, Democrat or whatever.
You know what's funny? By the standards of some FReepers, this makes the Tea Parties a bunch of dirty RINOs.
14 posted on
09/14/2010 4:19:23 PM PDT by
Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus
(The success of Darwinism was accompanied by a decline in scientific integrity. - Dr. Wm R. Thompson)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson