That is a KOOK publication.
Generally I thought it was defined Also Known As.., but somehow the use here seems to be another variety of jargon.
Best regards,
Has anybody sent this to the Democrats running cover for Barry?
Who could have ever believed that one day
more truth would come from PRAVDA than all the US
"news" media (also known as flacks and prreps) combined.
BeeHoe has much to fear from the foreign press. Someone, somewhere, is going to turn over a stone, and something is going to jump out at them.
The fun part of this is that every day, BeeHoe has to worry about it. McBeth anyone?
may be kooky, but it sure fits his imminence uhbamma mamba jamma farouk very well..bait and switch man, liar extraordinaire..
Here is another thing to consider. Birth Certificates might be protected by privacy laws in Hawaii but transactions for purchase should be available as public record. The COLB that AKA Obama offers as his proof (and has been deemed unreliable) just showed up without explanation. There is nothing from the State of Hawaii about AKA Obama requesting a copy of his BC. Obama, nor the DNC has come forward with evidence of a request for the copy so where did it come from? These cost $10 to get and if requested via the phone someone would have had to use a credit card or sent a check or money order by mail, yet, nothing is, or ever has been, offered as proof of even a request for the copy. Someone could have said here is a CC receipt, or a canceled check, or the remitter's copy of a money order.
Someone should have this without a doubt. Has anyone asked the State of Hawaii if there is a record of payment for a COLB from AKA Obama?
This is something that could even be forged easily but not even a forged receipt or record of payment of any kind has been offered.
Could the reason for this be that Obama's COLB is a forgery and no one even thought to forge a receipt for it from Hawaii?
Laws of the Territory of Hawaii ACT 96 To Provide For The Issuance Of Certificates Of Hawaiian Birth was in effect from 1911 until 1972 and allowed someone who was born outside the Hawaiian Islands to be registered as though he were born in Hawaii. Under that law, someone simply would have presented herself to the Hawaiian authorities and declared that the child was born in Hawaii. The person could have sworn under oath and presented witnesses and other evidence. If the authorities accepted it, that was the end of it. All a person had to do was file a false statement and Hawaii took them at their word.
from Pravda, huh? - Looks like the party may be turning against comrade Hussein 0bama.
The mystery of Obama’s background and eligibility could be resolved in a couple of weeks if there were enough politicians who wanted to get to the truth.
The problem is that these same politicians, and there should be many of them, are hiding the truth because of their involvement in the deception.
It is highly unlikely that the previous administration and John McCain and Sarah Palin, with their access to national security information, did not come across detailed data on Obama’s background. Especially McCain would have liked to know about his opponent’s background but he still remains mute on that subject, even today. More reason to distrust him.
The riddle of Obama’s eligibility will never be solved because government does not want it solved — it cannot admit that it hoodwinked the American people on a large scale.
The White Housre has denied it. The Elysee as well. I believe what is in the book. It is being sold as an “authorized “ memoir by Carka Sarkozy
The amount of speculation into Obama’s past is absolutley stunning. Trying to trace his past is like climbing a tree. As soon as you start up the trunk, there are alternate branches, and the branches have branches and then more branches
It may be impossible to obtain correct information on his life. As some people have said, it is like trying to prove Saquatch, UFOs or ghosts exist. There is evidence to suggest he is “here” but no verifiable proof that he has the past that he claims. Or the present.
...but can any World leader trust a man who has no past, no allegiance and no respect for the society that enabled him to run for public office? If a person has no loyalty and no respect to the people and the Nation that enabled him to succeed, he is incapable of being loyal about anything, to any purpose or to any person.
sfl