Posted on 09/20/2010 10:14:13 AM PDT by markomalley
We are doomed when a bunch of armchair warriors run our military.
Sadly, we have too few leaders anywhere in government. The word “leaders” implies “followers”. And “followers” implies those who *voluntarily* go along. Well, our “leaders” aren’t going anywhere we want to go. Therefore they are “rulers” and “draggers” who are *dragging* us against our will into a hideous societal makeover,
Well, they also stuck Amnesty and massive defense cuts into the appropiations bill. They may also stick a bailout into it for municipalities.
My view has changed.I USED to think that people were born gay and that it was acceptable.NOT ANYMORE!
He won’t be counseled or retired for his anti-christian bigotry; he will be promoted.
“He wont be counseled or retired for his anti-christian bigotry; he will be promoted.”
Better, take him to a ‘Nam Teaparty, aka “fraggin”.
“He wont be counseled or retired for his anti-christian bigotry; he will be promoted.”
Better, take him to a ‘Nam Teaparty, aka “fraggin”.
>>> Yet another douchebag so-called “General” who has not seen one second of combat in his entire career.
Sorta like Ike ?
In other words devout Catholics, Moslems, Jews, Baptists, Orthodox, etc. leave now or leave your faith at the door. Unless you’re willing to condone the behavior you don’t belong in our military. It would be interesting to look at the background of this guy.
Regarding the combat experience, he is wearing a patch on his blues...I don’t know what that indicates.
>>My view has changed.I USED to think that people were born gay
My views have changed too.
And some were Eunuchs from birth - There are congenital reproductive dysfunctions such as XXY and Androgen insensitivity syndrome - for which the afflicted should be treated with compassion.
However, treating those folks with compassion is one thing - fascilitating their exploitation by power-seeking activists whose sociopathy extends FAR beyond sexuality - is quite another.
Whether under Pharaohs, Caesars, Popes or Presidents; whether occultly or overtly - The Eunuchs have always coveted the power of those they were inbred to serve.
Example: http://www.defendthefamily.com/pfrc/books/pinkswastika/html/the_pinkswastika_4th_edition_-_final.htm
I feel for those who were born with both male and female sex organs. But that’s different than choosing to engage in a disease-spreading lifestyle. It’s funny;Homos are told that what their doing is OK,yet those who smoke or drink are greatly encouraged to stop. What is wrong with this picture?
Understand that this is THE reason to force “acceptance” of homos in the military -
to get the Christians and the conservatives OUT of the military,
in case it’s needed to “suppress an insurrection”, so to speak.
This day and age I wouldn’t argue for a moment that our military can and will be used to suppress political and ideological dissent. It is the way of tyrants. But I wonder how many members of our military identify themselves as Christians, be they practicing Christians or people who derive their values and beliefs from Christianity. What would our military be without them?
[But thats different than choosing to engage in a disease-spreading lifestyle.]
Yep.
It’s a sociopathic exploitation of reproductive dysfunction to effect political coercion.
And activism IS a choice.
Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:
Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of general interest.
>>What would our military be without them?
http://www.defendthefamily.com/pfrc/books/pinkswastika/html/the_pinkswastika_4th_edition_-_final.htm
So who does he expect to fight the war if all of these “bigots” “ get out”?
But through the Pentagon, Bostick is denying he ever said anything like that: “The statements attributed to me are inaccurate. I simply did not make those statements. Moreover, as a member of the Department of Defense Comprehensive Review Working Group, I have been extremely careful not to express any views that might influence the integrity of the comprehensive review. I therefore have not expressed any opinions that might suppress the opinions of anyone participating in our discussions. I find the statements falsely attributed to me to be personally reprehensible.”
So is the Washington Times recanting? Nope. Brett Drecker, the paper’s editorial page editor, tells Politico Bostick “either forgot what he said, is confused, or is lying,” citing multiple sources for the quote.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.