Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Ditto
That's called a Revolution.

No it isn't. The correct term is secession. The War of Independence was fought to preserve our form of government. It was the British who were trying to replace it.

73 posted on 09/27/2010 2:38:52 PM PDT by SeeSharp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]


To: SeeSharp

Say whaaa?!


74 posted on 09/27/2010 2:40:40 PM PDT by rockrr (Everything is different now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]

To: SeeSharp
No it isn't. The correct term is secession. The War of Independence was fought to preserve our form of government. It was the British who were trying to replace it.

Say what?

101 posted on 09/27/2010 3:19:10 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]

To: SeeSharp
The War of Independence was fought to preserve our form of government.

You are betraying your ignorance. The colonies lived under a monarchical form of government where all must swear allegiance to a King. The revolution was not intended to preserve a monarchy, or even about replacing one monarch with another. Its intent was to end monarchy and create a Republic based on the rule of law.

It is an insult to history to equate the cause of the Revolution and the lame excuses (only conjured only after the war) for the secession of the slave states. At the time of secession, they were quite honest that the only difference they had and the only thing they cared to preserve, was their ability to spread slavery where ever they could.

279 posted on 09/28/2010 7:25:18 AM PDT by Ditto (Nov 2, 2010 -- Time to Clean House.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson