Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: I cannot think of a name

The fraud margin is about 2 to 3 %. I doubt they can generate more than that. A 4% spread should beat them every time. They are not prepared in a lot of areas to create the 3% fraud needed. Some races will be close enough for the fraud to work but not that many.


4 posted on 10/18/2010 6:22:18 AM PDT by screaminsunshine (counter revolutionary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: screaminsunshine

“A 4% spread should beat them every time.”

On an average basis, you are correct. But there are key contests where the results are likely to be razor thin (Ohio for example).

The idea of having to overcome 4% fraud voting REALLY ticks me off.


6 posted on 10/18/2010 6:30:20 AM PDT by I cannot think of a name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: screaminsunshine
The fraud margin is about 2 to 3 %. I doubt they can generate more than that. A 4% spread should beat them every time. They are not prepared in a lot of areas to create the 3% fraud needed. Some races will be close enough for the fraud to work but not that many.

This is why both Whitman and Florina are toast in Mexifornia. Both are trailing, or even. That's not enough to overcome the margin of fraud.

10 posted on 10/18/2010 7:22:30 AM PDT by Sans-Culotte ( Pray for Obama- Psalm 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson