I thought there were more communists than this. I guess since the communists took over the Rat Party they are losing votes.
Didn't know they had blood. I don't think zombies are afraid of a chart.
This assumes they HAVE blood.
Gee I thought those damn Tea Party people where gunna tkae the votes away from the GOP /sarcasm.
Ping
Don’t believe the BS that the dhimmis are closing the gap on the challengers for the midterms.
When we turn out, they will be like deer in the headlights.
TURN OUT THE VOTE. PUT THE LAWN SIGNS UP. DEBATE ANYONE AND ANYBODY WHO UTTERS A STUPID LEFTIST PHRASE.
We must find Republicans with the spine and guts to shut down voter fraud! We must find patriots willing to watch the polls, detail and document the evidence, and then follow through with prosecution.
At the risk of delving into misogyny, can I entreat the fairer sex to get a bit firmer hold on their principles and vote accordingly? The fence-jumping is maddening to watch and only encourages the kind of issue-free, emotion-driven campaigns that have afflicted our elections for years.
AKA the "Mama Grizzly" effect.
The LEFT is in the process of dumping Obama. The signs are everywhere. Hillary will run in 2012. he Clinton machine is at work big time. The Washington Post story about Holder’s DOJ is just one case in point.
If you could see a chart of the Democrat party’s deployment of vote and voter fraud efforts across the country, it would make your blood run cold.
Part I- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OLD6VChcWCE&feature=related
Part II- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D0MESB6VZM4&feature=related
Part III- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KkXI-MNSb8Q&feature=related
If you want to know why so many Democrats are running away from Zero, Pelosi, and Reid, look no further than the numbers in this polling study. It also explains why we’re hearing so many reality-defying statements from Democrats. They’re not just losing an election - they’re losing all credibility as a national political party, and they’re scared witless.
One word sums up this report, and that is; Rejection.
*
| Changes in the Midterm Landscape: | ||||||
| November 2006 to October 2010 | ||||||
| Nov. 1-4, 2006 | Oct. 13-18, 2010 | |||||
| Vote Rep | Vote Dem | Adv | Vote Rep | Vote Dem | Adv | |
| % | % | % | % | |||
| All likely voters | 43 | 47 | D+4 | 50 | 40 | R+10 |
| Men | 45 | 46 | D+1 | 52 | 37 | R+15 |
| Women | 41 | 48 | D+7 | 49 | 43 | R+6 |
| 18-49 | 44 | 48 | D+4 | 50 | 40 | R+10 |
| 50-64 | 44 | 45 | D+1 | 50 | 41 | R+9 |
| 65+ | 42 | 48 | D+6 | 52 | 38 | R+14 |
| Ethnicity | ||||||
| White, non-Hisp. | 49 | 42 | R+7 | 56 | 34 | R+22 |
| Black, non-Hisp. | 07 | 81 | D+74 | 10 | 83 | D+73 |
| White men | 52 | 41 | R+11 | 56 | 33 | R+23 |
| White women | 47 | 43 | R+4 | 55 | 35 | R+20 |
| Education | ||||||
| College grad+ | 43 | 49 | D+6 | 50 | 43 | R+7 |
| Some college | 43 | 45 | D+2 | 53 | 35 | R+18 |
| HS or less | 44 | 46 | D+2 | 49 | 41 | R+8 |
| Family income | ||||||
| $75,000 or more | 50 | 43 | R+7 | 54 | 36 | R+18 |
| $30,000-$74,999 | 49 | 44 | R+5 | 52 | 40 | R+12 |
| Less than $30,000 | 32 | 62 | D+30 | 39 | 55 | D+16 |
| Republican | 92 | 04 | R+88 | 95 | 01 | R+94 |
| Democrat | 02 | 94 | D+92 | 08 | 88 | D+80 |
| Independent | 35 | 42 | D+7 | 49 | 30 | R+19 |
| Religious Affiliation | ||||||
| Protestant | 50 | 41 | R+9 | 56 | 35 | R+21 |
| White evangelical | 68 | 24 | R+44 | 75 | 16 | R+59 |
| White mainline | 45 | 45 | Even | 58 | 32 | R+26 |
| Catholic | 43 | 48 | D+5 | 52 | 40 | R+12 |
| White Catholic | 48 | 43 | R+5 | 53 | 37 | R+16 |
| Unaffiliated | 20 | 71 | D+51 | 37 | 52 | D+15 |
| Region | ||||||
| Northeast | 40 | 49 | D+9 | 44 | 45 | D+1 |
| Midwest | 40 | 51 | D+11 | 53 | 37 | R+16 |
| South | 48 | 42 | R+6 | 55 | 37 | R+18 |
| West | 44 | 47 | D+3 | 45 | 43 | R+2 |
PEW RESEARCH CENTER Oct. 13-18, 2010. Q10/10a. Based on likely voters. Likely voter estimates for 2010 based on a seven-question turnout scale.
A lot can change in two years, huh?