Latest installment from supposed "insider."
1 posted on
11/09/2010 2:58:51 PM PST by
maggief
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
To: little jeremiah; Fractal Trader; Alice in Wonderland; Bean Counter; fightinJAG; Nachum; I_be_tc; ...
2 posted on
11/09/2010 3:00:51 PM PST by
maggief
To: maggief
Howard Dean is going to be the stalking horse for Clinton’s Presidential bid (what the insider calls the “ice breaker”).
3 posted on
11/09/2010 3:09:02 PM PST by
agere_contra
(...what if we won't eat the dog food?)
To: maggief
Why do I feel this person is trying to set us up compliments of Soros?
5 posted on
11/09/2010 3:10:07 PM PST by
freekitty
(Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
To: maggief
11 posted on
11/09/2010 3:16:58 PM PST by
Shqipo
(I stand with AZ!)
To: maggief
Please add me to the ping list!
12 posted on
11/09/2010 3:17:40 PM PST by
nandrew
To: maggief
Try reading the ‘insider’ comments with your best Bob Beckel voice.
13 posted on
11/09/2010 3:17:40 PM PST by
Islander7
(If you want to anger conservatives, lie to them. If you want to anger liberals, tell them the truth.)
To: maggief
If Gibbs is the next to announce departure, this “insider” blog is going to get LOTS OF EYES from lots of places.
16 posted on
11/09/2010 3:23:55 PM PST by
Mariner
(USS Tarawa, VQ3, USS Benjamin Stoddert, NAVCAMS WestPac, 7th Fleet, Navcommsta Puget Sound)
To: maggief
I find it disturbing how much dancing they do around “birther” issues. Two years in, and nobody really knows who they elected to the Presidency??
We sure as hell are in trouble! I’m betting CIA knows for certain...
On the other hand, this pending White House scandal business is getting tedious. All we have are a bunch of allusions to something that is simmering just under the surface, that both the NYT and the Chicago Post apparently know all about, but still we have absolutely nothing to base any of this stuff on. It could be anything; and there has already been plenty of wild speculation.
As for Gibbs being the next to go, that has been talked about for quite some time now, and really isn’t a surprise to anyone. He’s lasted about as long as any Press Secretary has, so “the insider” isn’t telling anyone anything new with that.
The longer this soap opera goes on the more skeptical I get about the whole thing....
22 posted on
11/09/2010 3:41:39 PM PST by
Bean Counter
(Stout Hearts!!)
To: maggief
Please add me to the ping list. I don't know how much of it is true, but just the thought of an insider turning narc and exposing the terminal atmosphere inside the White House is a great diversion.
"But know this, that in the last days perilous times will come: for men will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, unloving, unforgiving, slanderers, without self-control, brutal, despisers of good, traitors, headstrong, haughty, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God, having a form of godliness but denying its power. And from such people turn away, for his name is Obama."
23 posted on
11/09/2010 3:45:50 PM PST by
Viking2002
(2010 - NO PRISONERS! NO QUARTER!)
To: maggief
Please add me to the PING list. Thanks.
26 posted on
11/09/2010 3:50:20 PM PST by
w4women
("All great change begins at the dinner table". Ronald Reagan)
To: maggief
Thanks for posting maggief, these interviews are awesome. That being said, I will never hold my breath waiting on this guys predictions.
I will watch to see what happens to Peter Griffin-Gibbs and give credit should his fat ass get the boot.
32 posted on
11/09/2010 4:08:07 PM PST by
JerseyDvl
(Sometimes the road less traveled.... is less traveled for a reason.)
To: maggief
This series was sounding plausible until the birther issue was broached. This is starting to sound eerily similar to the quidam, “men in gray suits” and “Clinton is going to declare martial law to stop the election” bunk.
It’s pretty obvious now this is a diversion. I’m done reading these.
34 posted on
11/09/2010 4:24:23 PM PST by
randita
(Visit keyhouseraces.com to find GOP House candidates who need your support to knock off a DEM.)
To: maggief
ConmenAndGypsys.ColdReading.Shotgun
37 posted on
11/09/2010 4:32:55 PM PST by
bvw
To: maggief
49 posted on
11/09/2010 6:41:40 PM PST by
COUNTrecount
(Barry...above his poi grade.)
To: zot
50 posted on
11/09/2010 6:48:04 PM PST by
Interesting Times
(SwiftVets.com. WinterSoldier.com. ToSetTheRecordStraight.com.)
To: Coldwater Creek
Pingaling
51 posted on
11/09/2010 6:56:06 PM PST by
pepperdog
(Why are Democrats Afraid of a Voter ID Law?)
To: maggief
Please add me to the ping list. Thank you.
52 posted on
11/09/2010 6:58:40 PM PST by
rambo316
To: maggief
Please add me to the ping list. Thank you!
53 posted on
11/09/2010 6:58:49 PM PST by
pepperdog
(Why are Democrats Afraid of a Voter ID Law?)
To: maggief
I am going to be watching ...Boehner... being considered ‘stupid’ by these rats is NOT a positive for US. Rather strange to read a so called insider be more in ‘terror’ of Nanny the Red keeping power than any kind of ‘fear’ over a Republican Speaker of the House... Hopefully Boehner learned from Newt's mistakes. The Clintons were reelected over those mistakes.
To: maggief
:) I love the “insider”. He makes my day.
94 posted on
11/11/2010 12:12:50 AM PST by
mojitojoe
(In itÂ’s 1600 years of existence, Islam has 2 main accomplishments, psychotic violence and goat curr)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson