Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: higgmeister

” The next thought is why?”

I would say 1 of 3 things. Either a Civil defense drill to test public perception of a crisis, a propulsion test or something happened to the missile and they removed the warhead and shot the missile off for safety reasons.

What we do know is it came from the ocean so the assumption would have to be it was launched from a sub.


14 posted on 11/10/2010 1:04:13 AM PST by EQAndyBuzz (Remember March 23, 1775. Remember March 23, 2010)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: EQAndyBuzz

“Either a Civil defense drill to test public perception of a crisis”

No need for orchestrated tests. They have plenty of real life experience to draw upon and don’t want to be blamed for potentially dampening the stock market.

“... a propulsion test or something happened to the missile and they removed the warhead and shot the missile off for safety reasons.”

That only makes sense if BO told them not to explain themselves. Otherwise, they would gladly have cleared this up and not look like they’re embarrassed.


17 posted on 11/10/2010 1:09:54 AM PST by Arthur Wildfire! March (Our 2010 victory was won the Tea Party Way, not the RINO way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson