I fail to see the 'devisiveness' in this comment - rather it is merely a recanting of historical fact. It's not Sarah's problem if some people would rather stick their heads in the sand and pretend reality isn't really there.
I coined a phrase “vicious truthing” for something like this.
The word “divisive” is not the word that we know. In liberal terms it means “any action that embarrasses progressives or democrats”.
Of course, we know its not divisive by our standards, because it is not further dividing anyone. Those who find her ‘divisive’ would never vote for her in any regard.
Note that no matter what Holder, or Obozo do, they are NEVER labeled divisive. You see, they are ‘uniters’ and its just that us bitter clingers are too dumb to get their message.
Only liberals and Palin haters want us to believe she is divisive. She’s clearly the most conservative of all possible 2012 candidates and she has more balls than most of the men in the Republican Party.