Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: coop71; ml/nj

I watched the video. Keeping in mind the source (sketchy as Coop71 said), I will say the video “appears” to support blogger Bob.

“Appears” being the key word. I see someone in a hurry whose stress is increased by having to stand in a glass box with a toddler in her arms and then having to hurry up and wait. I wonder what blogger bob did not include from CCTV.

I do not understand why they blurred out the wand. It makes me wonder how intimate the wand is with a person’s body.


54 posted on 11/23/2010 4:29:56 AM PST by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]


To: Protect the Bill of Rights

I *think* they blur the secondary “wanding” because they do a more complete pat down as well as the wanding, and it’s a privacy issue. The screener unbuttons the woman’s jeans, etc., if I recall correctly.

Something else that has been bugging me: I read the pacifier clip from the kidlet wasn’t really problem. It was the mom’s knee brace and she wasn’t telling screener she had one.

Weird.


55 posted on 11/23/2010 5:11:30 AM PST by coop71 (Being a redhead means never having to say you're sorry...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson