Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

The law that the post office relies on for its regulation states that a legitimate exception for carrying arms in the post office is for hunting or any other legitimate reason.
1 posted on 12/22/2010 7:07:17 PM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: marktwain
The Postal Service also can't claim that firearms are PROHIBITED on postal property. Postal Inspectors and postal police carry them. Firearms are ordinarily brought along with the delivery of accountable paper.

Most administrative offices are protected by armed guards.

Guns are common at, in, on and around post offices.

What is being demanded here by the DOJ attorneys arguing the case is that ONLY RURAL NCDBU customers are to be prohibited the protection of firearms at postal installations.

I think the standard violates the 14th Amendment.

2 posted on 12/22/2010 7:11:47 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain

They need to carry to protect themselves from postal workers going postal.


3 posted on 12/22/2010 7:57:36 PM PST by iowamark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain

As long as they are not POSTAL employees, I don’t see a problem.


5 posted on 12/22/2010 8:10:21 PM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain

My how times have changed. My dad, a part time postal employee at age 17, would deliver registered mail while carrying a post office issued gun.


7 posted on 12/22/2010 8:59:42 PM PST by Betty Jane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson